Extended Data Fig. 6: Dimension and noise contributions to local decorrelation performance. | Nature Neuroscience

Extended Data Fig. 6: Dimension and noise contributions to local decorrelation performance.

From: Optimal routing to cerebellum-like structures

Extended Data Fig. 6: Dimension and noise contributions to local decorrelation performance.

a, b: Dimension (a) and noise (b) contributions to the performance shown in Fig. 8b, using the same parameters. c, d: Dimension (c) and noise (d) contributions to the performance shown in Fig. 8c, using the same parameters. e-g: Dimension (e) and noise (f) contributions to the performance (g), for the antennal lobe architecture, as a function of the in-degree of Kenyon cells K. Input was generated using a clustered representation. The green dashed line indicates the value obtained with optimal compression. The parameters were chosen to be consistent with the insect olfactory system anatomy, that is D = Nc = 50, N = 1000, M = 2000, p = 1, f = 0.1, σ = 1, P = 100. Note that when K ≥ 8, the local decorrelation strategy requires more synapses than the optimal compression one, for which K = 7 and L = 20. h, i: Dimension (h) and noise (i) contributions to the performance shown in Fig. 8d, using the same parameters. For all panels, the shaded areas indicate the standard deviation across network realizations.

Back to article page