Extended Data Fig. 6: Ca2+ imaging sessions with episodes of wakefulness, NREM sleep, and REM sleep, control experiment for 2 P imaging with Ca2+-independent GFP, GRABNE expression, effect of adrenergic receptor antagonists on sleep, and comparison of cortical NE activity before and after microglia manipulations within the same brain state. | Nature Neuroscience

Extended Data Fig. 6: Ca2+ imaging sessions with episodes of wakefulness, NREM sleep, and REM sleep, control experiment for 2 P imaging with Ca2+-independent GFP, GRABNE expression, effect of adrenergic receptor antagonists on sleep, and comparison of cortical NE activity before and after microglia manipulations within the same brain state.

From: Microglia regulate sleep through calcium-dependent modulation of norepinephrine transmission

Extended Data Fig. 6: Ca2+ imaging sessions with episodes of wakefulness, NREM sleep, and REM sleep, control experiment for 2 P imaging with Ca2+-independent GFP, GRABNE expression, effect of adrenergic receptor antagonists on sleep, and comparison of cortical NE activity before and after microglia manipulations within the same brain state.

a, Two examples of Ca2+ imaging session. Top left, field of view containing multiple microglia (scale bar, 50 μm); Bottom left, high magnification view of the microglia soma and processes in the white box (scale bar, 10 μm); 5 ROIs in processes are outlined, whose Ca2+ traces are shown on the right together with EEG spectrogram (Freq., frequency), EMG amplitude (Ampl.), and color-coded brain states. b, An example 2 P imaging session with GFP showing consistent decrease in fluorescence during REM sleep. Top, EEG spectrogram (Freq., frequency); middle, EMG amplitude (Ampl.); bottom, GFP signal (from a Cx3cr1eGFP/+ mouse) and color-coded brain states. c, Image showing the expression of the GRABNE2m in the prefrontal cortex. Scale bar, 100 μm. d-f, Percentage of time (d), mean episode duration (e), and episode number per hour (f) within 3 h after i.c.v. infusion of Phen (α receptor antagonist) and Prop (β receptor antagonist), ICl (β2 receptor antagonist), or ACSF. Each circle indicates data from one mouse; bars, mean ± s.e.m.; n = 6 mice. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 (One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák’s test; d, NREM, P = 0.0058; ACSF vs. Phen+Prop, **P = 0.0037; ACSF vs. ICl, *P = 0.017; Wake, P = 0.023; ACSF vs. Phen+Prop, *P = 0.010; REM, P = 0.37; e, NREM, P = 0.037; ACSF vs. ICl, **P = 0.0012; Wake, P = 0.42; REM, P = 0.18; f, NREM, P = 0.053; Wake, P = 0.048; REM, P = 0.72;). g, Change of NE activity in each brain state induced by chemogenetic activation of microglia Gi signaling (difference between before (-40 – 0 min) and after (0 – 120 min) injection) (mean ± s.e.m., saline, n = 13 sessions, CNO, n = 14; from 5 mice; 8 to 12 ROIs were assessed for each session). *P < 0.05 (unpaired two-tailed t-test, *P = 0.033). h, Similar to (g), but for local perfusion experiments (difference between before (-20 – 0 min) and after (40 min – 60 min) drug perfusion) (mean ± s.e.m.; 2MeSADP, n = 8 sessions; PSB, n = 7; ACSF, n = 10, from 4 mice; 8 to 12 ROIs were assessed for each session). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 (One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák’s test; NREM, P = 0.002; ACSF vs. PSB, *P = 0.034; 2MeSADP vs. PSB, **P = 0.0015; Wake, P = 0.001; ACSF vs. 2MeSADP, *P = 0.033; ACSF vs. PSB, *P = 0.046; 2MeSADP vs. PSB, ***P = 0.0007).

Source data

Back to article page