Fig. 5: BMAL1 regulates dopaminergic neurogenesis by modulating progenitor proliferation and differentiation in human neuroepithelial stem cells.
From: Distinct radial glia subtypes regulate midbrain dopaminergic neuron development

a, Schematic of the differentiation protocol used to assess the role of BMAL1 in mesDA neurogenesis. BMAL1-KD and BMAL1-OE were performed in hLT-NES cells. BMAL1-OE was induced with doxycycline (Dox) at 2 μg ml−1 on day 4 and 1 μg ml−1 on day 5. Asterisks indicate additional BMAL1 induction days used in follow-up experiments. b–g, BMAL1-OE increases proliferation, neurogenesis and the yield of TH+ neurons. Representative immunofluorescence images showing Th+EdU+ neurons (arrowheads) in CTRL and BMAL1-OE hLT-NES. Cells were pulsed with 10 µM EdU for 4 h on day 2 (d), day 4 (b) or day 6 (f), followed by analysis on day 8. Arrowheads indicate cells undergoing neurogenesis (Th+EdU+) neurons. Box plots (c,e,g) showing the percentage of TH+ neurons+ (TH +/DAPI+), neurogenic cells (TH+EdU+/DAPI+) and proliferating progenitors (EdU+TH−/DAPI+) in response to BMAL1-OE on day 4 (c), day 2 (e) or day 6 (g) in CTRL and BMAL1-OE hLT-NES, n = 3 independent differentiations, 2 wells per condition. TH⁺/DAPI⁺ = 17.72 ± 0.33% (BMAL1-OE) versus 13.67 ± 1.39% (CTRL), P = 0.047; TH⁺EdU⁺/DAPI⁺ = 4.30 ± 0.26% (BMAL1-OE) versus 2.52 ± 0.30% (CTRL), P = 0.020; EdU⁺/DAPI⁺ = 58.60 ± 1.66% (BMAL1-OE) versus 35.45 ± 6.79% (CTRL), P = 0.037; mean ± s.e.m. (c). TH⁺/DAPI⁺ = 15.19 ± 0.84% (BMAL1-OE) versus 9.11 ± 1.84% (CTRL), P = 0.040; TH⁺EdU⁺/DAPI⁺ = 2.78 ± 0.12% (BMAL1-OE) versus 0.47 ± 0.15% (CTRL), P = 0.0003; EdU⁺TH−/DAPI⁺ = 33.61 ± 3.20% (BMAL1-OE) versus 23.26 ± 1.54% (CTRL), P = 0.043; mean ± s.e.m (e). TH⁺/DAPI⁺ = 12.40 ± 0.36% (BMAL1-OE) versus 12.08 ± 2.12% (CTRL), P = 0.891; TH⁺EdU⁺/DAPI⁺ = 0.88 ± 0.14% (BMAL1-OE) versus 1.04 ± 0.44% (CTRL), P = 0.746; EdU⁺TH−/DAPI⁺ = 38.51 ± 1.44% (BMAL1-OE) versus 21.89 ± 0.36% (CTRL), P = 0.0004; mean ± s.e.m (g). NS, not significant. h–k, BMAL1-KD impairs DA neurogenesis and reduces progenitor proliferation. Representative immunofluorescence images of TH+EdU+ neurons in shCTRL and shBMAL1 hLT-NES following a 4-h EdU pulse on day 4, analyzed on day 8 (h). Arrowheads indicate cells undergoing neurogenesis (TH+EdU+) neurons. Box plots showing the percentage of TH⁺ neurons, neurogenic (TH⁺EdU⁺/DAPI⁺) and proliferating cells (EdU⁺TH−/DAPI⁺) on day 8 (i). EdU⁺TH−/DAPI⁺ = 33.55 ± 1.19% (shBMAL1) versus 51.46 ± 4.28% (shCTRL), P = 0.016; TH⁺/DAPI⁺ = 3.73 ± 0.46% (shBMAL1) versus 4.12 ± 0.62% (shCTRL), P = 0.638; TH⁺EdU⁺/DAPI⁺ = 0.05 ± 0.03% (shBMAL1) versus 0.27 ± 0.05% (shCTRL), P = 0.020; mean ± s.e.m. Representative immunofluorescence images of TH+ and Ki67+ cells in shCTRL and shBMAL1 hLT-NES on day 4. Box plots showing the percentage of TH⁺ neurons and proliferating cells (Ki67⁺/DAPI⁺) on day 4 (k). Ki67⁺/DAPI⁺ = 28.91 ± 2.31% (shBMAL1) versus 42.52 ± 2.43% (shCTRL), P = 0.015; TH⁺/DAPI⁺ = 2.28 ± 0.39% (shBMAL1) versus 0.54 ± 0.11% (shCTRL), P = 0.013; mean ± s.e.m. Box plots display IQR, median (line), whiskers (1.5× IQR) and individual data points (scatter) (h,k). Asterisks indicate statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001), determined using two-tailed Student’s t test. n = 3 independent differentiations, two wells per condition. l–o, qPCR analysis following BMAL1-OE or BMAL1-KD. Gene expression was measured after BMAL1-OE on day 2 (m), day 4 (n), day 6 (o) or stable BMAL1-KD (l). Expression levels are shown as relative FC (ΔΔCt), normalized to day 0 ± s.e.m. from n = 3 independent differentiations. Arrows in m–o indicate Dox treatment timing. Asterisks denote statistical significance (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001), determined using two-tailed Student’s t test, with exact P values provided in Supplementary Table 2. FC, fold change.