Table 1 Dice and Matthews coefficients for each sample, obtained from the comparison of our neural network results and data from Larson et al.7.

From: A reusable neural network pipeline for unidirectional fiber segmentation

Sample

Tiramisu

U-Net

3D Tiramisu

3D U-Net

Dice

Matthews

Dice

Matthews

Dice

Matthews

Dice

Matthews

232p1, wet

97.58 ± 2.29%

96.55 ± 2.93%

97.58 ± 2.20%

96.60 ± 2.13%

94.54 ± 6.73%

92.28 ± 9.65%

95.59 ± 0.74%

93.71 ± 1.03%

232p3, cured

98.21 ± 0.04%

97.47 ± 0.06%

98.26 ± 0.04%

97.53 ± 0.06%

95.25 ± 6.36%

93.39 ± 8.88%

95.90 ± 1.00%

94.21 ± 1.30%

232p3, wet

97.79 ± 2.15%

96.87 ± 2.70%

97.85 ± 2.12%

96.98 ± 1.99%

94.86 ± 6.90%

92.76 ± 9.87%

95.68 ± 1.97%

93.92 ± 2.36%

244p1, cured

98.42 ± 0.03%

97.83 ± 0.05%

98.38 ± 0.04%

97.78 ± 0.05%

94.55 ± 7.74%

92.67 ± 10.54%

96.30 ± 1.25%

94.97 ± 1.54%

244p1, wet

98.08 ± 2.53%

97.39 ± 3.15%

98.10 ± 2.39%

97.43 ± 2.23%

94.81 ± 7.81%

92.97 ± 10.71%

96.67 ± 1.00%

95.45 ± 1.31%

  1. U-Net yields the highest Dice and Matthews coefficients for three of five samples. Tiramisu had highest Dice/Matthews coefficients for one of the datasets. 3D Tiramisu had the lowest Dice and Matthews coefficients.