Table 1 Questions and key aspects to be addressed that were suggested in the revision process of the Atlas repository.
From: Implementation of FAIR principles in the IPCC: the WGI AR6 Atlas repository
Technology | Do you find the used community tools appropriate/useful (in particular GitHub and R)? |
Structure | Do you find the structure of the repository appropriate in terms of navigation and functionality? |
Scope | Is the scope of the repository (datasets, reference regions and reference periods – including warming levels) clearly described? |
Guidance | Does the Atlas repository describe clearly the structure and use? What information is missing and what improvements could be made? |
Provenance | Do you find the provenance and intermediate information provided (including, e.g. model metadata and warming levels) suitable? |
Usefulness | Do you find this repository useful as a resource to the scientific community? |
Reusability | Do you find the R scripts and notebooks well documented and easy to follow (in particular for code reusability)? |
Notebooks | Do you find the auxiliary Jupyter notebooks informative and useful? |
License | Do you find the license for the code appropriate? |
Development | Do you have ideas for further development of the repository? |
