Table 3 Comparisons of bootstrap values for total and the most ten families sampled between the standard barcode tree and the plastid genome tree.
From: A DNA barcode library for woody plants in tropical and subtropical China
Clades (n=) | Phylogeny | Resolution | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0%–50% | 51%–70% | 71%–85% | 86%–100% | ||
all (1239) | Standard barcode tree | 20.44 | 13.17 | 8.97 | 57.27 |
Plastid genome tree | 5.49 | 5.01 | 3.47 | 85.86 | |
Lauraceae (87) | Standard barcode tree | 40.23 | 22.99 | 5.75 | 31.03 |
Plastid genome tree | 10.34 | 11.49 | 5.75 | 72.41 | |
Rosaceae (65) | Standard barcode tree | 21.54 | 16.92 | 12.31 | 49.23 |
Plastid genome tree | 6.15 | 6.15 | 9.23 | 78.46 | |
Rubiaceae (57) | Standard barcode tree | 7.02 | 7.02 | 12.28 | 73.68 |
Plastid genome tree | 3.51 | 0 | 5.26 | 91.23 | |
Moraceae (54) | Standard barcode tree | 22.22 | 14.81 | 11.11 | 51.85 |
Plastid genome tree | 6 | 0 | 0 | 94 | |
Fabaceae (50) | Standard barcode tree | 4 | 14 | 8 | 74 |
Plastid genome tree | 6 | 0 | 0 | 94 | |
Fagaceae (47) | Standard barcode tree | 44.68 | 14.89 | 19.15 | 21.28 |
Plastid genome tree | 10.64 | 12.77 | 6.38 | 70.21 | |
Euphorbiaceae (42) | Standard barcode tree | 23.81 | 4.76 | 9.52 | 61.9 |
Plastid genome tree | 7.14 | 11.9 | 2.38 | 78.57 | |
Malvaceae (41) | Standard barcode tree | 19.51 | 9.76 | 4.88 | 65.85 |
Plastid genome tree | 2.44 | 2.44 | 0 | 95.12 | |
Aquifoliaceae (36) | Standard barcode tree | 50 | 13.89 | 8.33 | 27.78 |
Plastid genome tree | 8.33 | 16.67 | 0 | 75 | |
Sapindaceae (33) | Standard barcode tree | 15.15 | 18.18 | 6.06 | 60.61 |
Plastid genome tree | 0 | 3.03 | 3.03 | 93.94 | |
