Correction to: Scientific Data https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05261-9, published online 30 May 2025

In Table 3 of this article, the data in the column Error < 3° for HVA and IMA were incorrectly given as 79.4% and 94.6%, but should have been 94.4% and 79.4%, respectively. The data in the column Error < 5° for HVA and IMA were given as 94.0% and 99.3%, but should have been 96.9% and 93.8%, respectively. In the subsection ‘Linear regression performance’ in the Technical Validation section, the corresponding values for Table 3 have also been corrected accordingly.

In addition, in the sentence beginning ‘The dataset was randomly divided...’ in the Technical Validation section, the value ‘957’ should instead have read ‘967’.

The original article has been corrected.