Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Data
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific data
  3. data descriptors
  4. article
A Defect Dataset for Electrode Coating Manufacturing
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Data Descriptor
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 February 2026

A Defect Dataset for Electrode Coating Manufacturing

  • Vignesh Sampath  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4277-70721,
  • Andrew S. Lee2,
  • Samuel David Miller2,
  • Noah H. Paulson1,
  • Yuepeng Zhang2 &
  • …
  • Logan Ward  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-1323-59391 

Scientific Data , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1871 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy and society
  • Research data

Abstract

Electrode is a key component of many energy storage and energy conversion devices such as batteries and fuel cells. Defects in electrodes can significantly influence device performance and reliability and thus need to be monitored and eliminated during the electrode manufacturing process. Advancements in in-line metrology, computer vision, and machine learning have enabled the development of integrated hardware-software systems for automated defect detection and diagnostics. While several manufacturing domains have published defect datasets to support such efforts, publicly available datasets specific to electrode coating processes are not available. To fill this gap and support research on defect detection for automated coating processes, we present CoatingVision, a comprehensive dataset of slot-die coating images with labeled defect types. This dataset supports a diverse range of image recognition tasks, including defect segmentation, defect detection, and multi-label classification. It includes high-resolution images with associated labels for common defects such as surface cracks, delamination cracks, pinholes, and unclassified defects. To facilitate benchmarking and reproducible research, CoatingVision is packaged with an open-source codebase that enables comparative evaluation of AI models and hyperparameter configurations. The dataset has been meticulously curated to ensure high quality and consistency, providing researchers with reliable data for training and evaluating computer vision models. With over 2,200 image samples under various processing conditions, CoatingVision offers a robust foundation for developing automated defect detection systems. It promotes deeper insights into defect formation in coating manufacturing processes, which can be used to advance various coating-related applications including batteries and fuel cells.

Similar content being viewed by others

Unsupervised defect clustering in atomic-resolution microscopy using a convolutional variational autoencoder

Article Open access 10 March 2026

A multi-model deep learning framework for SEM-based defect detection in \(\textrm{FAPbI}_3\) Perovskite thin films

Article Open access 25 November 2025

Transfer learning assessment of small datasets relating manufacturing parameters with electrochemical energy cell component properties

Article Open access 18 April 2025

Data availability

The dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29260121.v1.

Code availability

The code for data annotation, model training, and evaluation is available on GitHub at https://github.com/vigsam-coder/CoatingVision. The dataset has been uploaded to Figshare and can be accessed at https://figshare.com/articles/dataset/29260121.

References

  1. Reynolds, C. D., Slater, P. R., Hare, S. D., Simmons, M. J. H. & Kendrick, E. A review of metrology in lithium-ion electrode coating processes. Mater. Des. 209, 109971, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.109971 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Park, J. et al. Sustainable and cost-effective electrode manufacturing for advanced lithium batteries: the roll-to-roll dry coating process, Chem. Sci., https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sc00059s (2025).

  3. Du Baret De Limé, A. et al. Impact of Electrode Defects on Battery Cell Performance: A Review. Batter. Supercaps 5(10), e202200239, https://doi.org/10.1002/batt.202200239 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Choudhary, N. et al. Autonomous Visual Detection of Defects from Battery Electrode Manufacturing. Adv. Intell. Syst. 4(12), 2200142, https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202200142 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schoo, A., Moschner, R., Hülsmann, J. & Kwade, A. A. Coating Defects of Lithium-Ion Battery Electrodes and Their Inline Detection and Tracking. Batteries 9(2), 111, https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries9020111 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bryntesen, S. N. et al. Opportunities for the state-of-the-art production of lib electrodes—a review. Energies 14(5), 1406 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reynolds, C. D. et al. Rheology and structure of lithium-ion battery electrode slurries. Energy Technology 10(10), 2200545 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reynolds, C. et al. Impact of Formulation and Slurry Properties on Lithium‐ion Electrode Manufacturing. Batteries & Supercaps 7(2), e202300396 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, T. et al. Numerical and experimental investigation on the defect formation in lithium-ion-battery electrode-slot coating. Chemical Engineering Science 258, 117744 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mohanty, D. et al. Effect of electrode manufacturing defects on electrochemical performance of lithium-ion batteries: Cognizance of the battery failure sources. J. Power Sources 312, 70–79, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.02.007 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rieder, T. & Schlünder, E. U. Selective evaporation of a binary mixture into dry or humidified air. Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif. 27(2), 83–93, https://doi.org/10.1016/0255-2701(90)85012-S (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, G. L. Formation of films from polymer dispersions. J. Polym. Sci. 22(102), 423–434, https://doi.org/10.1002/pol.1956.1202210208 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Martinez, C. J. & Lewis, J. A. Shape Evolution and Stress Development during Latex−Silica Film Formation. Langmuir 18(12), 4689–4698, https://doi.org/10.1021/la0114833 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Scheepers, F. et al. Steering and in situ monitoring of drying phenomena during film fabrication. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 16(5), 1213–1221, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-019-00206-5 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tang, C.-S., Cui, Y.-J., Tang, A.-M. & Shi, B. Experiment evidence on the temperature dependence of desiccation cracking behavior of clayey soils. Eng. Geol. 114(3-4), 261–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2010.05.003 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tirumkudulu, M. S. & Russel, W. B. Cracking in Drying Latex Films. Langmuir 21(11), 4938–4948, https://doi.org/10.1021/la048298k (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chiu, R. C. & Cima, M. J. Drying of Granular Ceramic Films: II, Drying Stress and Saturation Uniformity. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(11), 2769–2777, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb04014.x (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bauer, C., Cima, M., Dellert, A. & Roosen, A. Stress Development During Drying of Aqueous Zirconia Based Tape Casting Slurries Measured by Transparent Substrate Deflection Method. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92(6), 1178–1185, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03000.x (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, P., Mujumdar, A. S. & Yu, B. Drying-Induced Cracks in Thin Film Fabricated from Colloidal Dispersions. Dry. Technol. 27(5), 636–652, https://doi.org/10.1080/07373930902820804 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  20. David, L. et al. Identifying degradation mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries with coating defects at the cathode. Appl. Energy 231, 446–455, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.073 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zi, B. et al. Coating defect detection in intelligent manufacturing: Advances, challenges, and future trends. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 97, 103079, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2025.103079 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tang, K., Zi, B., Xu, F., Zhu, W. & Feng, K. Coating defect detection method based on data augmentation and network optimization design. IEEE Sens. J. 23(13), 14522–14533, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2023.3277979 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tang, K., Li, Y., Zi, B. & Feng, K. A multimodal unsupervised coating defect detection method based on dual-branch hybrid CNN-Mamba U-Net. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 74(5026617), 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2025.3556907 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dais, D., Bal, İ. E., Smyrou, E. & Sarhosis, V. Automatic crack classification and segmentation on masonry surfaces using convolutional neural networks and transfer learning. Autom. Constr. 125, 103606, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103606 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ahmadi, A., Khalesi, S. & Bagheri, M. Automatic road crack detection and classification using image processing techniques, machine learning and integrated models in urban areas: A novel image binarization technique. J. Ind. Syst. Eng. 11(2018), 85–97 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zou, Q., Cao, Y., Li, Q., Mao, Q. & Wang, S. CrackTree: Automatic crack detection from pavement images. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 33(3), 227–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2011.11.004 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pak, M. & Kim, S. Crack Detection Using Fully Convolutional Network in Wall-Climbing Robot, in Advances in Computer Science and Ubiquitous Computing, 715, J. J. Park, S. J. Fong, Y. Pan, and Y. Sung, Eds., in Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 715 267–272, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9343-7_36, Singapore: Springer Singapore (2021).

  28. Liu, Y., Yao, J., Lu, X., Xie, R. & Li, L. DeepCrack: A deep hierarchical feature learning architecture for crack segmentation, Neurocomputing, 338 139–153, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.01.036 (2019).

  29. Junior, G. S. et al. Ceramic Cracks Segmentation with Deep Learning. Appl. Sci. 11(13), 6017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136017 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dorafshan, S., Thomas, R. J. & Maguire, M. SDNET2018: An annotated image dataset for non-contact concrete crack detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Data Brief 21, 1664–1668, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.11.015 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Yang, F. et al. Feature Pyramid and Hierarchical Boosting Network for Pavement Crack Detection. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 21(4), 1525–1535, https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2910595 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Eisenbach, M. et al. How to get pavement distress detection ready for deep learning? A systematic approach, in 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Anchorage, AK 2039–2047, https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2017.7966101 USA: IEEE (2017).

  33. Tabernik, D., Šela, S., Skvarč, J. & Skočaj, D. Segmentation-based deep-learning approach for surface-defect detection. J. Intell. Manuf. 31(3), 759–776, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-019-01476-x (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yang, K., Liu, Y., Zhang, S. & Cao, J. Surface Defect Detection of Heat Sink Based on Lightweight Fully Convolutional Network. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 71, 1–12, https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3188033 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 吴启科 吴, NEU-DET. IEEE DataPort. https://doi.org/10.21227/J84R-F770.

  36. Grishin, A. BorisV, iBardintsev, and Oleg, severstal-steel-defect-detection. [Online]. Available: https://kaggle.com/competitions/severstal-steel-defect-detection (2019).

  37. Kodytek, P., Bodzas, A. & Bilik, P. A large-scale image dataset of wood surface defects for automated vision-based quality control processes. F1000Research 10, 581, https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.52903.2 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sampath, V. CoatingVision: A Defect Dataset for Coating Manufacturing. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.29260121.v1 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P. & Brox, T. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention – MICCAI 2015, 9351, N. Navab, J. Hornegger, W. M. Wells, and A. F. Frangi, Eds, in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9351 234–241, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 Cham: Springer International Publishing (2015).

  40. Lin, T.-Y. et al. Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection, in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 936–944, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.106 Honolulu, HI: IEEE (2017).

  41. Chaurasia, A. & Culurciello, E. LinkNet: Exploiting encoder representations for efficient semantic segmentation, in 2017 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) 1–4, https://doi.org/10.1109/VCIP.2017.8305148 St. Petersburg, FL: IEEE (2017).

  42. Zhao, H., Shi, J., Qi, X., Wang, X. & Jia, J. Pyramid Scene Parsing Network, in 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 6230–6239, https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.660 Honolulu, HI: IEEE (2017).

  43. Patil, S., Miglani, A., Kankar, P. K. & Roy, D. Deep learning-based methods for detecting surface defects in steel plates, in Smart Electrical and Mechanical Systems 87–107, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90789-7.00001-4, Elsevier (2022).

  44. Baygin, M., Karakose, M., Sarimaden, A. & Akin, E. Machine vision based defect detection approach using image processing, in 2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP) 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1109/IDAP.2017.8090292 Malatya: IEEE (2017).

  45. Khanam, R. & Hussain, M. YOLOv11: An Overview of the Key Architectural Enhancements, arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2410.17725 (2024).

  46. He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S. & Sun, J. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition, arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1512.03385 (2015).

  47. Liu, Z. et al. A ConvNet for the 2020s, arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2201.03545 (2022).

  48. Tan, M. & Le, Q. V. EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networks https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.1905.11946 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Technologies Office and the Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD) program at Argonne National Laboratory.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Data Science and Learning Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA

    Vignesh Sampath, Noah H. Paulson & Logan Ward

  2. Applied Materials Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Lemont, IL, USA

    Andrew S. Lee, Samuel David Miller & Yuepeng Zhang

Authors
  1. Vignesh Sampath
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew S. Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Samuel David Miller
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Noah H. Paulson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuepeng Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Logan Ward
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: V.S., A.L., N.P., Y.Z. Data curation: V.S. Methodology: V.S., A.L., N.P., Y.Z. Formal analysis: V.S. Data Acquisition: S.M., A.L., V.S. Y.Z. Validation: V.S., L.W. Software: V.S., L.W. Investigation: V.S., A.L., N.P., Y.Z. Manuscript preparation: V.S. Supervision: N.P., Y.Z.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vignesh Sampath.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Table (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sampath, V., Lee, A.S., Miller, S.D. et al. A Defect Dataset for Electrode Coating Manufacturing. Sci Data (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06419-1

Download citation

  • Received: 10 June 2025

  • Accepted: 02 December 2025

  • Published: 14 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-06419-1

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • Aims and scope
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Journal Metrics
  • Policies
  • Open Access Fees and Funding
  • Calls for Papers
  • Contact

Publish with us

  • Submission Guidelines
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Data (Sci Data)

ISSN 2052-4463 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene