Table 2 Comparison of our study with five recent ovine CNV reports using various platforms.
This study | Jenkins 2016 | Zhu 2016 | Hou 2015 | Ma 2015 | Liu 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
platform | SNP600 | aCGH | SNP600 | aCGH | SNP50 | SNP50 |
sample/breed | 48 | 30 | 120 | 5 | 160 | 100 |
CNVR count | 1296 | 3488 | 490 | 51 | 111 | 238 |
CNVR range | 1 Kb–2.3 Mb | 1 Kb–3.6 Mb | 100 Kb–805 Kb | 52 Kb–21.1 Mb | 14 Kb–567 Kb | 14 Kb–1.3 Mb |
CNVR gain | 119 | n.a. | 93 | 23 | 99 | 13 |
CNVR loss | 1173 | n.a. | 390 | 21 | 12 | 219 |
CNVR both | 5 | n.a. | 7 | 7 | 0 | 6 |
Median size | 46 Kb | 8 Kb | 133 Kb | 117 Kb | 101 Kb | 187 Kb |
Mean size | 93 Kb | 19 Kb | 165 Kb | 89 Kb | 124 Kb | 254 Kb |
Genome coverage | 4.7% | 2.7% | 3.3% | 0.6% | 4.8% | 2.3% |
overlapping with this study | n.a. | 340 | 340 | 15 | 10 | 187 |
CNVRs overlapped within genes | 81% | 59% | 81.06–90.90% | 100% | n.a. | 53.36% |
