Figure 2
Classification analysis. (A) ROIs used for classification analyses. ROIs were defined are based on the major differences found in the seed analysis for the bvFTD comparison respect to controls: the light-blue and green one are the results from the first seed analysis (where we used the Frontal Left and Frontal Right seed from Fig. 1A), while the yellow and red one are the results from the second seed analysis, in which we used the light-blue and green ROIs from the first analysis as seeds. The average connectivity of these ROIs was used to define four of the CNV indexes for the classification analysis. (B) Classification analysis based on the NPS variables. The classification rates obtained were 83,8% for bvFTD vs Controls, 88,3% for AD vs Controls and 66,7% for bvFTD vs AD. (c) Classification analysis based on the CNV variables. The classification rates obtained were 72,7% for bvFTD vs Controls, 44,9% for AD vs Controls and 72,2% for bvFTD vs AD. (D) Classification analysis based on the combination of CNV and NPS variables. The classification rates obtained were 87,4% for bvFTD vs Controls, 88,0% for AD vs Controls and 72,9% for bvFTD vs AD.
