Table 2 Network Based Statistics (NBS) for testing component-level associations between functional connectivity and individual characteristics (n = 64).

From: Brain functional connectivity difference in the complete network of an entire village: the role of social network size and embeddedness

Variables

Association

Statistics

Component threshold

p < 0.01

p < 0.005

p < 0.001

Size

(pNBS)

Size

(pNBS)

Size

(pNBS)

Age

āˆ’

Extent

86

(0.011)

28

(0.031)

4

(0.083)

Ā 

Intensity

35.9

(0.011)

8.0

(0.057)

2.1

(0.044)

Years of education

+

Extent

19

(0.229)

8

(0.228)

1

(0.628)

Ā 

Intensity

4.7

(0.331)

0.9

(0.590)

0.0

(0.625)

Social network size

+

Extent

12

(0.347)

8

(0.225)

6

(0.042)

Ā 

Intensity

9.4

(0.156)

6.7

(0.081)

2.5

(0.037)

Social network embeddedness (continuous)

+

Extent

48

(0.051)

32

(0.024)

9

(0.017)

Ā 

Intensity

24.7

(0.030)

14.5

(0.020)

3.7

(0.016)

Social network embeddedness (low = 0, high = 1)

+

Extent

73

(0.016)

47

(0.010)

12

(0.010)

Ā 

Intensity

36.6

(0.011)

20.9

(0.010)

3.8

(0.017)

  1. Note: From each set of ROI-pairs selected by pair-level tests with three different thresholds of p < 0.01, p < 0.005, and p < 0.001, NBS detects the largest ROI-component based on the extent (the number of ROI-pairs) or intensity (the extent weighted by the strength of associations), and calculates p-values (pNBS) from the rate of cases where empirical brain networks have larger extent or intensity than 5,000 simulated networks. All the analyses were performed with covariates of gender, MMSE score, age, years of education, social network size, and social network embeddedness. The continuous form of social network embeddedness was used when testing the hypotheses for other major predictors.