Table 1 Comparison of infection rates (logistic regression model*).

From: Potential risk of re-emergence of urban transmission of Yellow Fever virus in Brazil facilitated by competent Aedes populations

Population

Virus

Day post-infection

Species

Aedes aegypti (AE)

Aedes albopictus (AL)

Goiânia (GOI)

4408-1E

7

1

0.46 (0.26–0.83)

14–21

2.58 (1.58–4.22)

1.19 (0.56–2.52)

74018-1D

7

2.10 (1.13–3.91)

1.20 (0.59–2.42)

14–21

5.43 (2.41–12.23)

3.10 (1.30–7.37)

S-79

7

1.19 (0.64–2.21)

1.34 (0.66–2.70)

14–21

3.08 (1.39–6.85)

3.45 (1.46–8.17)

Manaus (MAN)

4408-1E

7

2.87 (1.26–6.50)

0.32 (0.12–0.88)

14–21

3.85 (1.79–8.24)

0.43 (0.17–1.08)

74018-1D

7

2.75 (1.16–6.54)

0.38 (0.15–0.97)

14–21

3.68 (1.67–8.09)

0.51 (0.23–1.12)

S-79

7

1.41 (0.58–3.33)

0.38 (0.15–0.98)

14–21

1.89 (0.84–4.22)

0.51 (0.22–1.19)

Rio de Janeiro (RIO)

4408-1E

7

5.90 (2.49–13.99)

0.28 (0.10–0.78)

14–21

7.47 (3.20–17.44)

0.36 (0.13–0.95)

74018-1D

7

3.28 (1.41–7.63)

0.19 (0.07–0.53)

14–21

4.15 (1.96–8.79)

0.29 (0.10–0.61)

S-79

7

3.64 (1.56–8.49)

0.42 (0.17–1.08)

14–21

4.61 (2.13–9.98)

0.53 (0.23–1.26)

Congo (CON)

4408-1E

7

2.82 (1.27–6.25)

1.57 (0.67–3.82)

14–21

2.44 (1.18–5.06)

1.39 (0.61–3.17)

74018-1D

7

1.36 (0.55–3.39)

0.96 (0.41–2.23)

14–21

1.18 (0.51–2.71)

0.83 (0.38–1.84)

S-79

7

1.59 (0.65–3.91)

2.20 (0.99–4.88)

14–21

1.38 (0.61–3.12)

1.91 (0.91–2.98)

  1. *Model with interaction between species and population, between species and virus, between population and virus, and also between population and day post-infection.