Table 6 Comparative acaricidal activity by vapor bioassays of benzaldehyde analogues with 2,3-dihyderoxybenzaldehyde against T. putrescentiae (aEach chemical mixed at 9:1 ratio with 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehyde.

From: Food Protective Effects of 3-Methylbenzaldehyde Derived from Myosotis arvensis and Its Analogues against Tyrophagus putrescentiae

Chemical

Each chemical with 2,3-dihydroxybenzaldehydea

Observed values (μg/cm3)b

Expected values (μg/cm3)b

LD50 (95% CL)

LD95 (95% CL)

Slope

χ2 value

LD50 (Wadley)c

LD95 (Wadley)c

R50 d

R95 d

S50 e

S95 e

2-Methylbenzaldehyde

1.48 (1.12–1.90)

6.94 (5.17–9.01)

2.58 ± 0.38

4.275 (5, 0.511)

1.45

5.07

0.98

0.73

Add

Add

3-Methylbenzaldehyde

1.81 (1.42–2.25)

7.83 (6.20–11.52)

2.60 ± 0.36

9.079 (6, 0.169)

2.16

8.08

1.19

1.03

Add

Add

4-Methylbenzaldehyde

1.85 (1.52–2.28)

6.01 (4.62–9.14)

3.25 ± 0.45

2.480 (5, 0.779)

2.56

8.17

1.38

1.36

Add

Add

2,3-Dimethylbenzaldehyde

1.74 (1.37–2.13)

6.60 (5.18–9.11)

2.69 ± 0.39

4.671 (5, 0.457)

1.71

6.21

0.98

0.94

Add

Add

2,4-Dimethylbenzaldehyde

1.66 (1.28–1.98)

5.55 (4.21–7.85)

3.09 ± 0.43

6.376 (5, 0.271)

1.26

5.15

0.76

0.93

Add

Add

2,5-Dimethylbenzaldehyde

1.21 (0.96–1.54)

5.28 (4.04–7.96)

2.66 ± 0.43

3.785 (4, 0.436)

1.42

6.55

1.17

1.24

Add

Add

2,4,5-Trimethylbenzaldehyde

0.84 (0.56–1.11)

3.24 (2.14–4.77)

2.40 ± 0.39

6.401 (6, 0.380)

0.86

2.99

1.02

0.92

Add

Add

  1. bExpected LD50 based on Wadley’s calculation model. cWadley’s calculation of expected LD50 and LD95. dSynergy ratio from Wadley’s calculation of expected LD50 and LD95. eDetermination of interaction of the mixture based on Wadley’s determination method: when R > 1.5, synergistic (Syn) interaction; when 1.5 ≥ R > 0.5, additive (Add) interaction; when R ≤ 0.5, antagonistic interaction).