Figure 4
From: Power-law scaling of calling dynamics in zebra finches

The exponents of different callings changed transiently in response to the social context (a) and the access to water (b). (a) Comparison of median empirical cumulative distribution functions (<eCDF>) between the inter-event intervals (τ) of “stack” calls during cohabitation (coh) and separation (sep). After limiting the social input to the auditory cues, the exponents (α) of reactive female (“m-f”) callings (p m-f = 0.039, n = 8) and reactive male (“f-m”) callings (p f-m = 0.027, n = 8) decreased while this did not change the exponents of self-contained female (“f-f”) and male (“m-m”) callings (p > 0.7, n = 8). (b) Comparison of <eCDFs> between the situations before, during and after removal of water. Removing water from males (wr male) increased the exponents (α) of self-contained male (“m-m”) callings (p m-m = 0.023, n = 7). Removing water from females (wr female) increased the exponents of self-contained male (“m-m”) callings (p m-m = 0.016, n = 7), of reactive female (“m-f”) callings (p m-f = 0.016, n = 7) and of reactive male (“f-m”) callings (p f-m = 0.008, n = 7). The other modes of callings remained unchanged (p > 0.050, n = 7). The exponents of base line and recovery were similar for all four modes of callings (p > 0.100, n = 7, recovery data are not shown on the ladder plots). n.s. and * indicate non-significant and significant, respectively. P(τ): the cumulative distribution of the inter-event intervals; τ (s): the inter-event intervals in seconds.