Table 4 The Extracted Data from the Studies Reporting Diagnostic Indexes for Using 2D GLS.
Study | Cut-off | TP | FP | TN | FN | AUC | Sensitivity | Specificity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | ||||||||
C. S., 2013 | −12 | 49 | 42 | 148 | 11 | 0.673 | 82% | 78% |
12% | ||||||||
C. E., 2010 | −13.8 | 11 | 2 | 46 | 2 | 0.95(0.86–0.99) | 85% | 96% |
A. T., 2013 | −16.5 | 17 | 7 | 28 | 8 | 0.80 (0.68–0.92) | 68% | 85% |
M. K., 2015 | −11.3 | 10 | 4 | 14 | 2 | 0.82 (0.67–0.98) | 77.8% | 83.3% |
15.7% | ||||||||
N. M., 2011 | −15.9 | 22 | 11 | 120 | 10 | 0.81(0.72–0.91) | 68.8% | 91.5% |
20% | ||||||||
M. G., 2013 | −12.3 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 4 | 0.83 | 82% | 87% |
50% | ||||||||
A. T., 2013 | −14.4 | 59 | 47 | 266 | 15 | 0.88(0.83–0.93) | 80% | 85% |
C. S., 2013 | −11 | 29 | 45 | 165 | 10 | 0.66 | 75% | 78% |
M. L., 2015 | −9.1 | 31 | 86 | 225 | 12 | NA | 71.8% | 72.4% |
