Table 3 Eigen-values of cotton fiber elongation with cotton cultivars of Simian 3 and Siza 3 under the elevated and ambient temperature regimes from 2010 to 2012.

From: Simulative Global Warming Negatively Affects Cotton Fiber Length through Shortening Fiber Rapid Elongation Duration

Cultivars

Year

Temperature regime

R2

FED

FRED

Vmax

Lenm (mm)

Lenobs (mm)

(d)

95% Conf.

(mm·d−1)

95% Conf.

Simian 3

2010

Elevated

0.997**

22

7

0.44

2.43

0.14

27.3

27.1 a

Ambient

0.999**

27

9

0.31

2.04

0.06

27.7

27.6 a

CTE (%)

 

−18.5

−22.2

 

19.1

 

−1.4

−1.8

2011

Elevated

0.975**

26

9

0.17

2.10

0.04

28.5

28.5 a

Ambient

0.981**

28

10

0.07

1.87

0.01

29.5

29.1 a

CTE (%)

 

−7.1

−10.0

 

12.3

 

−3.5

−2.1

2012

Elevated

0.988**

21

7

0.03

2.52

0.01

26.8

26.4 b

Ambient

0.981**

25

8

0.09

2.18

0.02

27.7

27.5 a

CTE (%)

 

−16.0

−12.5

 

15.6

 

−3.3

−4.0

CV across years (%)

Elevated

  

13.0

 

9.37

 

3.1

3.9

Ambient

  

11.0

 

7.44

 

3.6

3.2

Siza 3

2010

Elevated

0.996**

21

8

0.15

2.35

0.05

27.0

26.6 b

Ambient

0.998**

30

11

0.19

1.69

0.03

29.0

28.7 a

CTE (%)

 

−30.0

−27.3

 

39.1

 

−6.8

−7.3

2011

Elevated

0.988**

24

8

0.13

2.38

0.04

29.0

28.7 b

Ambient

0.983**

28

9

0.12

2.12

0.02

29.9

29.8 a

CTE (%)

 

−14.3

−11.1

 

12.3

 

−2.8

−3.7

2012

Elevated

0.987**

27

8

0.13

2.34

0.04

28.3

28.2 b

Ambient

0.982**

32

9

0.15

2.12

0.03

29.0

29.0 a

CTE (%)

 

−15.6

−11.1

 

10.4

 

−2.6

−2.8

CV across years (%)

Elevated

  

3.1

 

1.0

 

3.7

3.9

Ambient

  

12.7

 

12.7

 

1.7

2.0

  1. FRED, fiber rapid−elongation duration; Vmax, the maximum fiber elongation rate; 95% Conf., 95% confidence interval; Lenm, theoretical maximum fiber length; Lenobs, observed fiber length; CTE, Coefficient of temperature elevation; CV, Coefficient of variation; **significant difference at 0.05 probability level (n = 6, R2 0.05 = 0.6584, R2 0.01 = 0.8413; n = 9, R2 0.05 = 0.4440, R2 0.01 = 0.6354; n = 10, R2 0.05 = 0.3994, R2 0.01 = 0.5885). Values followed by a different letter within the same column are significantly different at 0.05 probability levels.