Table 1 Comparison of the sensing performances of multiple materials based gas sensors toward methanol.
From: A high selective methanol gas sensor based on molecular imprinted Ag-LaFeO3 fibers
Materials | Response | Optimal temperature (°C) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
Porous In2O3 nanobelts | 9.5 (20 ppm) | 370 | |
SnO2-ZnO nanofibers | 8.5 (10 ppm) | 350 | |
Ce-In2O3 nanospheres | 35.2 (100 ppm) | 320 | |
Cu fibers | 35 (100 ppm) | 325 | |
α-Fe2O3 polyhedral crystals | 2.5 (50 ppm) | 340 | |
ZnO/SnO2 nanostructures | 9.6 (100 ppm) | 300 | |
α-Fe2O3 | 25 (10 ppm) | 280 | |
Au-decorated ZnO | 7 (50 ppm) | 300 | |
SnO2-ZnO nanofiber | 7 (10 ppm) | 250 | |
Pd0.5Pd3O4-ZnO | 10.5 (50 ppm) | 260 | |
CdS-SnO2 | 70 (5000 ppm) | 200 | |
Zn-SnO2 nanorods clusters | 59 (50 ppm) | 270 | |
Ag-TiO2/SnO2 | 15 (10 ppm) | 275 | |
α-Fe2O3 discoid crystals | 6.4 (100 ppm) | 250 | |
Al-ZnO thin films | 1.79 (500 ppm) | 275 | |
WO3 | 24 (100 ppm) | 260 | |
La0.8Pd0.2FeO3 | 146.6 (400 ppm) | 230 | |
SnO2 hollow spheres | 10 (10 ppm) | 225 | |
Macroporous LaFeO3 | 96 (100 ppm) | 190 | |
CuO thin film | 0.12 (500 ppm) | 350 | |
ALMF-1 | 23.5 (5 ppm) | 175 | This work |
ALMF-2 | 19.67 (5 ppm) | 125 | |
ALMF-3 | 17.59 (5 ppm) | 125 |
