Table 2 Differential abundance analysis results on public clonotypes.
DA clonotypes in: | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Repertoire type | No. of Clonotypes (RP Pvalue < 0.01)+ | No. of DA clonotypes (SFS Accuracy > = 0.75)* | Sorted | Total CDPBMC | CDPBMC 0 | CDPBMC 6 | Total CDGUT | CDGUT GFD | CDGUT active | study (Qiao et al.)11 | study (Han et al.)7 | study (Petersen et al.)15 | repPC (Britanova et al.)14 | |
Enriched Public clonotypes | CDPBMC | 70 | 33 | 4 | 33 | 11 | 33 | 17 | 14 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 21 |
HCPBMC | 95 | 95 | 5 | 51 | 26 | 36 | 37 | 26 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 47 | |
CDGUT | 60 | 30 | 0 | 15 | 8 | 13 | 30 | 15 | 30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 15 | |
Deriched public clonotypes | CDPBMC | 75 | 38 | 3 | 38 | 38 | 16 | 18 | 10 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
HCPBMC | 102 | 101 | 4 | 56 | 35 | 36 | 46 | 29 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 53 | |
CDGUT | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
