Table 1 Adams’s modularity test for the total sample and subsamples, modularity hypotheses and shape components. Columns presents covariance ratio (CR) and p-value. Bold and italic indicate the lowest CR value for asymmetric and symmetric component of the shape variation, respectively.

From: Developmental pathways inferred from modularity, morphological integration and fluctuating asymmetry patterns in the human face

Source

Module

Component

CR

P-value

Total

Functional

Asymmetric

0.4841

0.001

Symmetric

0.6148

0.001

Facial third

Asymmetric

0.5030

0.001

Symmetric

0.8151

0.005

Middle line

Asymmetric

0.5320

0.001

Symmetric

0.6559

0.001

Neuro-face

Asymmetric

0.7145

0.003

Symmetric

0.7531

0.001

American

Functional

Asymmetric

0.5534

0.001

Symmetric

0.6498

0.001

Facial third

Asymmetric

0.5778

0.001

Symmetric

0.8542

0.006

Middle line

Asymmetric

0.6052

0.001

Symmetric

0.6901

0.001

Neuro-face

Asymmetric

0.8006

0.004

Symmetric

0.7651

0.001

European

Functional

Asymmetric

0.4997

0.001

Symmetric

0.6110

0.001

Facial third

Asymmetric

0.5264

0.001

Symmetric

0.8155

0.001

Middle line

Asymmetric

0.5265

0.001

Symmetric

0.6572

0.001

Neuro-face

Asymmetric

0.6890

0.002

Symmetric

0.7557

0.001

Admixed (Heterozygous)

Functional

Asymmetric

0.4903

0.001

Symmetric

0.6238

0.001

Facial third

Asymmetric

0.5039

0.001

Symmetric

0.8388

0.005

Middle line

Asymmetric

0.5411

0.001

Symmetric

0.6670

0.001

Neuro-face

Asymmetric

0.7292

0.003

Symmetric

0.7532

0.001

Homozygous

Functional

Asymmetric

0.5084

0.001

Symmetric

0.6152

0.001

Facial third

Asymmetric

0.5316

0.001

Symmetric

0.8432

0.006

Middle line

Asymmetric

0.5440

0.001

Symmetric

0.6561

0.001

Neuro-face

Asymmetric

0.7286

0.003

Symmetric

0.7692

0.001