Table 1 Main outcomes of laboratory crosses obtained in previous studies, with the four Ciona species studied.

From: Coupling molecular data and experimental crosses sheds light about species delineation: a case study with the genus Ciona

Original name

Putative name

Sampling area

Main outcome (with original species name)

Reference

Ciona savignyi

Ciona intestinalis

Ciona savignyi

Ciona robusta

California (USA)

Full reproductive isolation

Lambert, et al.30

Ciona intestinalis

Ciona roulei

Ciona edwardsi

Ciona robusta

Ciona roulei

Ciona edwardsi

Banyuls-sur-Mer (France)

Partial reproductive isolation (asymmetry) between C. roulei and C. intestinalis

Full reprodutive isolation of C. edwardsi with C.roulei and C. intestinalis

Ciona intestinalis

Ciona intestinalis

Ciona intestinalis

Ciona robusta

Celtic Seas (Scotland, UK)

NW Pacific (Kyoto, Japan)

Partial reproductive isolation between specimens of Japanese vs. Scottish origin (fertilization rate: 2.3%-70.4%)

Suzuki, et al.14

Ciona intestinalis type A

Ciona intestinalis type B

Ciona robusta

Ciona intestinalis

Plymouth (UK) and Naples (Italy)

Plymouth (UK)

C. intestinalis type A and B isolated

Caputi, et al.15

Poor success of allopatric crosses with C. intestinalis type A

Ciona intestinalis type A

Ciona intestinalis type B

Ciona robusta

Ciona intestinalis

English Channel (Plymouth, UK)

No reproductive isolation (no asymmetry)

Sato, et al.22

Ciona intestinalis type A

Ciona intestinalis type B

Ciona robusta

Ciona intestinalis

English Channel (Plymouth, UK)

no reproductive isolation, hybrids F1 fertile, back-crosses possible

Sato, et al.27

Ciona intestinalis type A

Ciona intestinalis type B

Ciona robusta

Ciona intestinalis

English Channel (Moulin Blanc, France)

English Channel (Aber Wrac’h, France)

Partially isolated (asymmetry)

Bouchemousse, et al.26

Ciona robusta

Ciona intestinalis

Ciona robusta

Ciona intestinalis

English Channel (Moulin Blanc, France)

English Channel (Aber Wrac’h, France)

No isolation using C. intestinalis as maternal lineage

Malfant et al.53

  1. “Original name” corresponds to the species name used in the paper whereas “Putative name” is the species name that we propose to be the most likely following the taxonomic revision and nomenclature accepted from September 2015.