Figure 5 | Scientific Reports

Figure 5

From: The antidepressant fluoxetine acts on energy balance and leptin sensitivity via BDNF

Figure 5

FLX acts on energy balance and leptin sensitivity in animals exposed to high fat diet. (A) Weight gain with respect to start of FLX treatment for H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD mice. RM 2-way ANOVA (time effect, F(2,54) = 30.18, P < 0.0001; matching, F(27,54) = 1.85, P = 0.027; n = 24–27) followed by Bonferroni posthoc test, *P < 0.05. (B) Body weight at the end of the treatment in H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD mice. Student’s t-test (t = 3.02 df = 34, **P = 0.0048; n = 18). (C) Weight of white fat depots (EPI, SC and PERI) in H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD mice. Student’s t-test (EPI WAT t = 2.932 df = 31, **P = 0.0063; PERI WAT t = 2.169 df = 31, *P = 0.038; n = 15–18). (D) Food intake in H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD; the arrow indicates the start of FLX treatment and each point represents a daily average per week (n = 24–27). (E) Daily total energy expenditure of H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD mice measured by doubly labelled water method. Student’s t-test (t = 5.885 df = 17, ***P < 0.0001; n = 10–9). (F) Infrared locomotor activity monitoring assessed in H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD mice (number of animals = 6; n = 100). Mann Whitney test (**P = 0.0073). (G) Plasma leptin in H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD mice. Student’s t-test (t = 2.428 df = 15, *P = 0.028; n = 8–9). (H) 14 hours cumulative food intake in H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD mice at baseline and in response to i.p. leptin (3 mg/kg) injection (n = 11–7). (I) Left, representative immunofluorescence showing expression of pSTAT3 45’ after an injection of saline (sal) or leptin (lep, 3 mg/kg) in the ARC of H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD. Scale bar is 100 μm. Right, signal for pSTAT3 normalized to that of STAT3 was acquired in H2O-HFD and FLX-HFD mice. All data are expressed as % of the mean of the H2O-HFD injected with saline. 2-way ANOVA (treatment × stimulus, F(1,12) = 14.78, P = 0.0023; n = 3) followed by Bonferroni posthoc test, *P < 0.05 versus H2O, §§§P < 0.001 versus saline. Data are presented as mean ± s.e.m.

Back to article page