Table 1 Results of regression analysis of cumulative impact score (I c ) against the state of coralligenous outcrops using different models.
From: A regional assessment of cumulative impact mapping on Mediterranean coralligenous outcrops
Regression analysis | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | R 2 | SE | Significance level | AICc | Run test | |
P (%) | no. of runs | |||||
Linear | 0.40 | 2.41 | *** | 45.90 | 57.93 | 15 |
Log | 0.47 | 2.28 | *** | 42.93 | 59.19 | 15 |
Log-Linear | 0.42 | 0.33 | *** | −57.02 | 57.93 | 15 |
Log-Log | 0.51 | 0.31 | *** | −61.50 | 43.23 | 14 |
Ranks of cumulative impact score | ||||||
Thresholds | ||||||
Degradation level | Halpern et al. 6 | Linear | Log | Log-Linear | Log-log | |
10 (Low) | 1.40 | 5.55 | 3.78 | 5.07 | 3.86 | |
30 (Medium) | 4.95 | 7.58 | 8.00 | 6.79 | 7.19 | |
50 (Medium-High) | 8.47 | 9.62 | 9.97 | 9.10 | 9.59 | |
70 (High) | 12.00 | 11.66 | 11.26 | 12.18 | 11.60 | |
90 (Very high) | 15.52 | 13.69 | 12.23 | 16.31 | 13.37 | |
