Figure 5 | Scientific Reports

Figure 5

From: Conduit stability effects on intensity and steadiness of explosive eruptions

Figure 5

(a) Axisymmetric conduit with fixed radius in depth and a local enlargement along a vertical distance zr (geometry NC1). (b) Conduit with two coaxial cylindrical portions connected by a linearly variable transitional zone of length zr (geometry NC2). (c) Conduit with a lower axisymmetric portion with fixed radius in depth connected with the surface by a linearly enlarging zone (geometry NC3). (d) Ratio of mass discharge rates versus deepening of fragmentation level (NC1 versus fixed-radius equivalent case). (e) Ratio of exit velocities versus ratio of exit pressures (NC1 versus fixed-radius equivalent case). (f) Ratio of mass discharge rates versus deepening of fragmentation level (NC2 versus fixed-radius equivalent case). (g) Ratio of exit velocities versus ratio of exit pressures (NC2 versus fixed-radius equivalent case). (h) Ratio of mass discharge rates versus deepening of fragmentation level (NC3 versus fixed-radius equivalent case). (i) Ratio of exit velocities versus ratio of exit pressures (NC3 versus fixed-radius equivalent case). Here we present results related to rhyolitic magmas, whereas results related to dacitic, trachytic and phonolites magmas are exhibited in Supplementary Figs S2, S3 and S4, respectively.

Back to article page