Table 2 Population-size estimates from Capture-Mark-Recapture (CMR) or Capture-per-Unit-Area depletion (CPUA) method. In the CMR, adult fish were marked with either visible implant elastomer tags (CMR-e) or by fin-clipping (CMR-f).

From: Longitudinal demographic study of wild populations of African annual killifish

Site

Species

Method

Capture date

Area m2

Age

Captured fish

Recapture probability

Population size estimate (lower CI; upper CI)

Ch1

F

CMR-e

7.3.16

2138

41

145

0.19

748 (515; 981)

LN1

F

CMR-e

9.4.16

255

28

192

0.60

318 (264; 372)

LN2

F

CMR-e

19.4.16

1518

38

237

0.52

457 (402; 512)

O

CMR-e

19.4.16

1518

38

28

0.52

53 (31; 75)

LN4

F

CMR-e

10.4.16

626

26

210

0.15

1422 (1103; 1741)

LS1

F

CMR-e

11.4.16

836

24

74

0.36

204 (45; 363)

O

CMR-e

11.4.16

836

24

133

0.52

256 (189; 323)

LS2

F

CMR-f

5.2.16

3150

26

191

0.18

1054 (694; 1414)

2.3.16

812

52

41

0.08

492 (184; 800)

O

CMR-f

2.3.16

812

52

47

0.15

315 (135; 495)

P

CMR-f

2.3.16

812

52

126

0.11

1099 (694; 1504)

LS3

F

CPUA

23.1.16

356

13

877

0.34–0.50#

8714–19263~

LS4

F

CPUA

24.1.16

108

14

128

0.48–0.75#

577–1120~

LS5

F

CMR-f

6.2.16

2550

26

414

0.10

4247 (2827; 5667)

2.3.16

1081

51

140

0.23

613 (427; 799)

  1. The population size in subadult fish was estimated only using enclosures and CPUA. The ranges of capture probability (#) and population size estimate (~) for CPUA are given.