Table 2 The association of TMB levels and clinical status.

From: Molecular profiles and tumor mutational burden analysis in Chinese patients with gynecologic cancers

  

TMB, median (range), mutations/Mb

P valuea

TMB level

P valueb

Low (%)

Moderate to high (%)

Age, median (range), years

  

0.04

  

0.26

    <40

14

0 (0–4.80)

 

13 (92.86%)

1 (7.14%)

 

    >=40

103

0.67 (0–41.45)

 

83 (80.58%)

20 (19.42%)

 

Site of Disease

  

0.81

  

0.11

Ovary (include primary peritoneal and fallopian tube)

68

0.36 (0–22.26)

 

60 (88.24%)

8 (11.76%)

 

    Cervix

32

0.67 (0–40.81)

 

23 (71.87%)

9 (28.13%)

 

    Endometrial

17

2.30 (0–41.45)

 

13 (76.47%)

4 (23.53%)

 

stage

  

0.001c

  

0.03

    Stage I

21

0 (0–3.20)

 

21 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

    Stage II

34

0 (0–4.80)

 

30 (88.24%)

4 (11.76%)

 

    Stage III

43

0.83 (0–22.26)

 

34 (79.07%)

9 (20.93%)

 

    Stage IV

15

2.92 (0–41.45)

 

8 (53.33%)

7 (46.67%)

 

    NA

4

2.62 (0.45–13.80)

 

3 (75%)

1 (25%)

 

HPV status (Cervix cancer)

  

0.506

  

0.255

    positive

9

0 (0–9)

 

7 (77.78%)

2 (22.22%)

 

    negative

5

2 (0–7)

 

5 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

    uncertain

18

2.28 (0–40.81)

 

11 (61.11%)

7 (38.89%)

 

Subtype of Endometrial Carcinoma

  

  

    Type I

16

2.30 (0–41.45)

 

12 (75%)

4 (25%)

 

    Type II

1

0.95

 

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

Tissue types

  

0.34

  

0.18

    Serous adenocarcinoma

60

0.36 (0–22.26)

 

52 (86.67%)

8 (13.33%)

 

    Clear cell adenocarcinoma

3

0.38 (0–3.20)

 

3 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

    Endometroid adenocarcinoma

17

2.30 (0–41.45)

 

13 (76.47%)

4 (23.53%)

 

    Squamous cell carcinoma

31

0.99 (0–40.81)

 

22 (70.97%)

9 (29.03%)

 

    Mucinous adenocarcinoma

1

0

 

1 (100%)

0 (0%)

 

    Other

5

0 (0–2.30)

 

5 (100%)

0 (0%)

 
  1. Note: acalculated using Mann-Whitney test/Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison as post-hoc test. bCalculated using Pearson’s chi-square test. cCalculated using Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison as post-hoc test, the Dunn’s multiple comparison showed that the difference between stage I and stage IV, stage II and stage IV, satge I and stage III were statistical significant (P = 0.0007, 0.019, and 0.009 respectively).