Table 1 Summary data for all the performance dependent variables. Mean values ± SD for the whole sample included in the ANOVAs performed.

From: Adaptability and reproducibility of a memory disruption rTMS protocol in the PharmaCog IMI European project

mean ± SD

n

Day 1 (Sham TMS)

Day 2 (Active TMS)

Day 3 (Active TMS)

Vertex

L-DLPFC

Vertex

L-DLPFC

Vertex

L-DLPFC

Encoding

Accuracy (%)

65

97 ± 3.5

97 ± 3.6

97 ± 3.6

96 ± 4.7

  

19

96.8 ± 3.7

96.6 ± 4.4

97.4 ± 4.2

94.7 ± 5

97.5 ± 3

97.4 ± 3.8

RT (ms)

64

759 ± 282

751 ± 277

801 ± 247

832 ± 260

  

18

683 ± 187

668 ± 175

708 ± 219

750 ± 246

792 ± 210

844 ± 225

Recognition

Hits (%)

68

79 ± 12.5

79.3 ± 12

79.9 ± 12

72.2 ± 16

  

21

75.2 ± 11

76.4 ± 13

77.6 ± 13

56.7 ± 14

75.4 ± 15

72.5 ± 19

FA (%)

68

10.4 ± 10.1

11.5 ± 10.7

  

21

15.3 ± 11.8

13.4 ± 11

12.8 ± 13

RT fMRI (ms)

56

1234 ± 311

1249 ± 249

1193 ± 355

1215 ± 366

  

15

1164 ± 191

1191 ± 204

1095 ± 149

1137 ± 180

1128 ± 135

1127 ± 166

RT EEG (ms)

12

724 ± 168

719 ± 209

669 ± 198

716 ± 190

  

5

653 ± 176

602 ± 128

543 ± 111

613 ± 121

621 ± 127

632 ± 138

  1. For reaction times (RTs), data are shown in the Modality subgroups in milliseconds (ms) for the recognition task. RT fMRI corresponds to RTs when fMRI was being acquired, while RT EEG corresponds to RTs under EEG recordings.
Back to article page