Table 4 Estimates of HBI and SR for members of the An. gambiae complex estimated by meta-analysis.
HBI | SR | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency (95% C.I.) | Cochran Q (d.f.) | I2 (95% C.I.) | Frequency (95% C.I.) | Cochran Q (d.f.) | I2 (95% C.I.) | |
Anopheles gambiae s.l . | ||||||
All studies | 66.6% | 13109.8** | 99.3% | 1.6% | 2566.1** | 96.6% |
(59.6–73.2%) | (87) | (99.3–99.4%) | (1.2–2%) | (87) | (96.3–96.9%) | |
Presence of bednets | 65.8% | 6005.3** | 99.4% | 0.8% | 981.39** | 96.4% |
(55.5–75.3%) | (35) | (99.4–99.4%) | (0.5–1.2%) | (35) | (95.9–96.8%) | |
No bednets | 87% | 919.9** | 99% | 5% | 94.5** | 90.5% |
(73.7–96%) | (9) | (98.9–99.1%) | (3.2–7.2%) | (9) | (85.1–93.3%) | |
Anopheles arabiensis | ||||||
All studies | 53.8% | 6849** | 99.3% | 0.9% | 924.9** | 94.7% |
(44.9–62.6%) | (49) | (99.2–99.3%) | (0.6–1.2%) | (49) | (94–95.3%) | |
Presence of bednets | 58.5% | 3817.4** | 99.5% | 0.5% | 309** | 93.5% |
(45.2–71.2%) | (20) | (99.4–99.5%) | (0.2–0.8%) | (20) | (91.8–94.7%) | |
No bednets | 73% | 541.9** | 99.4% | 2.3% | 6.5NS | 53.9% |
(30.7–98.8%) | (3) | (99.3–99.5%) | (1.3–3.6%) | (3) | (0–82.9%) | |
Anopheles coluzzii | ||||||
All studies | 54.8% | 17.8** | 88.8% | 0.5% | 15.2* | 86.9% |
(39.3–69.9%) | (2) | (58.3–94.5%) | (0–1.6%) | (2) | (42.8–93.9%) | |
Anopheles gambiae s.s . | ||||||
All studies | 93.4% | 124.2** | 95.2% | 5.8% | 171.5** | 96.5% |
(88.2–97.1%) | (6) | (92.9–96.5%) | (2.5–10.4%) | (6) | (95.1–97.3%) | |