Table 3 Summary of methods and results.
Species | Study Site | Data Collection Technique | Dominance Contexts | Linearity, Stability, & Null Dyads | Rank Analyses | Correlations with other Social Behaviors |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Captive Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes, N = 7) | Chimpanzee Sanctuary Northwest (Cle Elum, WA, USA) | All-occurrence agonistic and affiliative data collection three days per week from June through August 2017 (N = 31) | Agonistic Competition | h′ = 0.50P = 0.256 Stab = 0.92 Null = 0 | DSˆ | Affiliation Agonism Nearest Neighbor |
I & SIˆ | ||||||
ELO | ||||||
PERCˆ | ||||||
ADAGIOˆ | ||||||
Lack of Agonism§ | h′ = 0.93* P < 0.01 Stab = 0.98 Null = 0 | DSˆ | Affiliation Agonism◊ Nearest Neighbor | |||
I & SIˆ | ||||||
ELOˆ | ||||||
PERCˆ | ||||||
ADAGIOˆ | ||||||
Privileged Role | h′ = 0.93* P < 0.01 Stab = 0.98 Null = 0 | DSˆ | Affiliation◊ Agonism Nearest Neighbor | |||
I & SIˆ | ||||||
ELOˆ | ||||||
PERCˆ | ||||||
ADAGIOˆ | ||||||
Priority Access to Resources§ | h′ = 0.75* P = 0.04 Stab = 0.91 Null = 0 | DSˆ | Affiliation◊ Agonism Nearest Neighbor | |||
I & SIˆ | ||||||
ELO | ||||||
PERCˆ | ||||||
ADAGIOˆ | ||||||
Free-ranging (provisioned) adult Tibetan macaques (M. thibetana, N = 24) | Mt. Huangshan (Anhui Province, China) | All-occurrence agonistic and focal-follow allogrooming data collection daily from July through August 2016 (N = 36) | Agonistic Competition§ | h′ = 0.34* P < 0.001 Stab = 0.99 Null = 60% | DSˆ | Grooming Maternal Kinship |
I & SIˆ | ||||||
ELOˆ | ||||||
PERCˆ | ||||||
ADAGIOˆ | ||||||
Lack of Agonism§ | h′ = 0.10 P = 0.06 Stab = 0.99 Null = 59% | DSˆ | Grooming Maternal Kinship◊ | |||
I & SIˆ | ||||||
ELOˆ | ||||||
PERCˆ | ||||||
ADAGIOˆ |