Table 4 Risk of bias and applicability of the studies included.

From: Diagnostic accuracy of salivary gland ultrasonography with different scoring systems in Sjögren’s syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

 

Risk of bias

Concerns about applicability

Bias due to patient selection

Bias due to index test

Bias due to reference standard

Bias due to flow and timing

Applicability of patient selection

Applicability of index test

Applicability of reference standard

El Miedany et al.10

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

High concern

Low concern

Niemela et al.11

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

High concern

Low concern

Su et al.12

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

Unclear

Low concern

Hocevar et al.13

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

High concern

Low concern

Low concern

Yang et al.14

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

Unclear

Low concern

Song et al.15

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

Unclear

Low concern

Salaffi et al.16

Low risk

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

High concern

Low concern

Unclear

Poul et al.17

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

High concern

High concern

Unclear

Milic et al.18

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

High concern

Low concern

High concern

Milic et al.19

Low risk

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

High concern

Low concern

Unclear

Xu et al.20

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

Low concern

High concern

Takagi et al.21

Low risk

Low risk

Unclear

Low risk

High concern

High concern

Unclear

Kong et al.22

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

Low concern

High concern

Milic et al.23

Low risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

High concern

Low concern

High concern

Cornec et al.24

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High concern

High concern

High concern

Theander et al.25

High risk

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low concern

Low concern

Unclear

Hammenfors et al.26

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

High concern

High concern

Baldini et al.27

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High concern

High concern

High concern

Zhang et al.28

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

Low concern

High concern

Lin et al.29

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

High concern

High concern

High concern

Zhou et al.30

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

High concern

High concern

Zhou et al.31

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

High concern

High concern

Chen et al.32

High risk

Unclear

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

Unclear

High concern

Qi et al.33

High risk

High risk

Low risk

Low risk

Low concern

Low concern

High concern