- Article metrics
- Last updated: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 2:22:28 Z
US gynecologists’ estimates and beliefs regarding ovarian cancer screening’s effectiveness 5 years after release of the PLCO evidence
Access & Citations
-
- 2408
- Article Accesses
-
- 16
- Citations
Citation counts are provided by Dimensions and depend on their data availability. Counts will update daily, once available.
Online attention
- 3 tweeters
- 5 news outlets
- 22 Mendeley
This article is in the 94th percentile (ranked 25,590th) of the 448,080 tracked articles of a similar age in all journals and the 91st percentile (ranked 197th) of the 2,447 tracked articles of a similar age in Scientific Reports
View more on Altmetric
Altmetric calculates a score based on the online attention an article receives. Each coloured thread in the circle represents a different type of online attention. The number in the centre is the Altmetric score. Social media and mainstream news media are the main sources that calculate the score. Reference managers such as Mendeley are also tracked but do not contribute to the score. Older articles often score higher because they have had more time to get noticed. To account for this, Altmetric has included the context data for other articles of a similar age.
Mentions in news and blogs
-
Ovarian Cancer Screening: Assessing the Risks and Benefits
Clinical Advisor -
Eierstockkrebsfrüherkennung: Gynäkolog*innen überschätzen den Nutzen und unterschätzen den Schaden
Informationsdienst Wissenschaft -
Ovarian cancer screening: Gynecologists overestimate the benefits and underestimate the harms
Informationsdienst Wissenschaft -
US-Gynäkologen überschätzen den Nutzen der Eierstockkrebsfrüherkennung
Deutsches Ärzteblatt
This list highlights individual mainstream news articles and blogs that cite the article. Not all news and blogs link to articles in a way that Altmetric can pick up, so they are not representative of all media. Altmetric are responsible for the curation of this list and provide updates hourly.