Table 2 Comparisons of EZH2 expression among different clinicopathologic characteristics of urothelial carcinoma following surgical treatment.
EZH2 high n (%) | EZH2 low n (%) | *p | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sex | |||
Male | 120 (77.4) | 35 (22.6) | 0.628 |
Female | 25 (73.5) | 9 (26.5) | |
Age | |||
>60 year | 95 (76.6) | 29 (23.4) | 0.962 |
≤60 year | 50 (76.9) | 15 (23.1) | |
Smoking history | |||
Smoker | 60 (75.9) | 19 (24.1) | 0.832 |
Nonsmoker | 85 (77.3) | 25 (22.7) | |
Tumor grade | |||
Low grade | 107 (71.3) | 43 (28.7) | 0.001 |
High grade | 38 (97.4) | 1 (2.6) | |
Pathologic stage | |||
MIBC | 102 (81.6) | 23 (18.4) | 0.027 |
NMIBC | 43 (67.2) | 21 (32.8) | |
Lymph nodal status | |||
Positive | 22 (100.0) | 0 (0.0) | 0.018 |
Negative | 90 (78.9) | 24 (21.1) | |