Table 2 Secondary (symmetric) (\({a}_{l}^{u}\)) and primary (antisymmetric) (\({b}_{l}^{u}\)) harmonic terms, and estimates for its relative contribution (b/a ratio), carried out from Model G fitting curves from this work and other studies based on VGP dispersion analyses for most of the Phanerozoic.

From: Paleomagnetic Evidence for Inverse Correspondence between the Relative Contribution of the Axial Dipole Field and CMB Heat Flux for the Past 270 Myr

#

Work

Interval (Myr)

\(\,{a}_{l}^{u}\)

\(\,{b}_{l}^{u}\)

b/a

1

De Oliveira et al.26(a)

262.0–318.0

\({9.4}_{7.5}^{10.9}\)

\({0.27}_{0.22}^{0.29}\)

\({0.029}_{0.021}^{0.037}\)

2

This work(b)

228.7–266.7

\({\bf{13}}{\boldsymbol{.}}{{\bf{2}}}_{{\bf{6.8}}}^{{\bf{16.3}}}\)

\({\bf{0.1}}{{\bf{2}}}_{{\bf{0.11}}}^{{\bf{0.13}}}\)

\({\bf{0.00}}{{\bf{9}}}_{{\bf{0.004}}}^{{\bf{0.014}}}\)

3

Biggin et al.25(c)

145.0–200.0

\({16.4}_{10.3}^{19.0}\)

\({0.19}_{0.00}^{0.46}\)

\({0.012}_{0.000}^{0.028}\)

4

Biggin et al.25(d)

84.0–125.0

\({8.7}_{6.3}^{10.7}\)

\({0.27}_{0.22}^{0.31}\)

\({0.031}_{0.021}^{0.041}\)

5

McFadden et al.27

45.0–80.0

\({9.7}_{8.2}^{11.2}\)

\({0.34}_{0.31}^{0.37}\)

\(\,{0.035}_{0.029}^{0.041}\)

6

McFadden et al.27

22.5–45.0

\({15.4}_{12.7}^{20.3}\)

\({0.29}_{0.21}^{0.35}\)

\(\,{0.019}_{0.012}^{0.026}\)

7

McFadden et al.27

5.0–22.5

\({17.8}_{16.9}^{18.7}\)

\({0.19}_{0.16}^{0.22}\)

\(\,{0.011}_{0.009}^{0.012}\)

8

Johnson et al.28

0–5.0

\({14.6}_{13.4}^{15.6}\)

\({0.20}_{0.13}^{0.24}\)

\(\,{0.014}_{0.009}^{0.019}\)

  1. u (l): upper (lower) limits for the shape parameters a and b; (a)PCRS – Permian-Carboniferous Reversed Superchron; (b)IHMP – Illawarra Hyperzone of Mixed Polarity; (c)Jurassic; (d)CNS – Cretaceous Normal Superchron.