Table 3 Mean values concerning fixation duration in the different Stroop tasks (ms), depending on the condition.

From: Induced vergence-accommodation conflict reduces cognitive performance in the Stroop test

Task

Condition

Mean value in fixation duration (ms)

Friedman’s ANOVA results

Post-hoc Wilcoxon test results

Reading

Control

327.6 ± 54.9

X²(21, 2) = 2.00

p = 0.37

 

Prism

345.2 ± 83.2

Lens

335.7 ± 59.8

Denomination

Control

432.0 ± 61.9

X²(21, 2) = 0.38

p = 0.83

 

Prism

440.4 ± 96.3

Lens

425.3 ± 71.8

Interference

Control

543.6 ± 90.0

X²(21, 2) = 4.57

p = 0.101

 

Prism

594.5 ± 158.9

Lens

574.2 ± 122.3

Stroop Interference Effect

Control

111.5 ± 67.5

X²(21, 2) = 12.09

p = 0.0023*

−C vs P: Z = 2.87, p = 0.004*

−C vs L: Z = 2.21, p = 0.027*

Prism

154.1 ± 112.2

Lens

148.9 ± 76.4

  1. Associated calculation of the Stroop interference effect is indicated, as Friedman’s ANOVA and post-hoc Wilcoxon tests results. Significant differences are written in bold type.