Table 3 Results of the repeated measures ANOVA with 4 within-subjects factors.
From: Comparison of different smartphone cameras to evaluate conjunctival hyperaemia in normal subjects
Objective Evaluation | Subjective Evaluation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Relative Redness | RGdiff | RBdiff | RedHue | Evaluator 1 | |
p-value | p-value | p-value | p-value | p-value | |
Calibration | 0.007* | 0.015* | 0.035* | 0.010* | 0.759 |
Camera | 0.027* | 0.009* | 0.004* | 0.010* | 0.929 |
Lighting | 0.015* | <0.001* | <0.001* | 0.020* | 0.069 |
Magnification | 0.006* | <0.001* | <0.001* | 0.001* | 0.116 |
Calibration*Camera | 0.003* | 0.001* | <0.001* | 0.002* | 0.056 |
Calibration*Lighting | 0.027* | <0.001* | <0.001* | 0.135 | 0.094 |
Camera*Lighting | 0.079 | 0.073 | 0.051 | 0.171 | 0.126 |
Calibration*Magnification | 0.006* | 0.005* | 0.178 | 0.004* | 0.498 |
Camera*Magnification | 0.013* | 0.184 | 0.102 | 0.028* | 0.054 |
Lighting*Magnification | 0.965 | 0.699 | 0.827 | 0.288 | 0.168 |
Calibration*Camera*Lighting | 0.020* | 0.002* | <0.001* | 0.244 | 0.247 |
Calibration*Camera*Magnification | <0.001* | 0.138 | 0.147 | <0.001* | 0.167 |
Calibration*Lighting*Magnification | 0.022* | 0.728 | 0.966 | 0.720 | 0.301 |
Camera*Lighting*Magnification | 0.647 | 0.374 | 0.436 | 0.514 | 0.224 |
Calibration*Camera*Lighting*Magnification | 0.924 | 0.558 | 0.840 | 0.343 | 0.602 |