Table 2 EF2 for MS strategy using each individual program and consensus strategies.
From: Exponential consensus ranking improves the outcome in docking and receptor ensemble docking
System | CDK2 | ESR1 | ADRB2 | CAH2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Merging and Shrinking | Score | Rank | Score | Rank | Score | Rank | Score | Rank |
AutoDock | 12.0 | 11.0 | 14.6 | 14.6 | 5.3 | 4.9 | 1.2 | 1.2 |
ICM | 12.0 | 14.0 | 20.5 | 20.9 | 18.0 | 18.0 | 2.0 | 2.2 |
LeDock | 15.0 | 15.0 | 8.7 | 9.1 | 2.2 | 2.7 | 7.8 | 7.6 |
rDock | 11.0 | 11.0 | 17.7 | 19.3 | 8.0 | 8.0 | 7.3 | 8.1 |
Smina | 6.0 | 7.0 | 15.8 | 15.4 | 1.9 | 2.4 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
AutoDock Vina | 7.0 | 4.0 | 9.8 | 11.0 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 2.0 | 1.4 |
RSF | 2.0 | 1.0 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
AASS | 18.0 | 17.3 | 4.3 | 9.0 | ||||
RbN | 13.0 | 22.1 | 12.9 | 7.8 | ||||
Z-score | 18.0 | 22.1 | 9.7 | 10.2 | ||||
RbR | 13.0 | 19.3 | 8.5 | 9.5 | ||||
RbV | 17.2 | 22.3 | 10.2 | 9.0 | ||||
ECR | 16.0 | 23.2 | 12.9 | 10.0 | ||||
