Table 1 Variable comparison between groups.

From: Should the outcome of focal photocoagulation for center-sparing diabetic macular edema require expanding the definition of center involvement?

Variable

Group 1 (n = 77)

Group 2 (n = 20)

Group 3 (n = 63)

p α

p β (1 vs. 2)

p β (1 vs. 3)

p β (2 vs. 3)

Female gender (%)

51.9

70.0

53.9

0.34

Arterial hypertension (%)

40.3

50.0

49.2

0.5

Proliferative retinopathy (%)

36.3

30.0

19.0

0.08

Baseline visual impairment (%)

51.9

55

28.6

0.01*

1.0

0.005*

0.03*

Age (years, mean ± SD)

57.5 ± 11.7

61.9 ± 8.3

53.8 ± 17.6

0.12

Diabetes duration (years, mean ± SD)

14.5 ± 6.5

13.1 ± 7.4

15.4 ± 6.7

0.75

Fasting glycaemia (mg/dl, mean ± SD)

158.1 ± 62.6

145.2 ± 57.4

184.3 ± 110.7

0.63

Visual acuity before treatment (logMAR, mean ± SD)

0.40 ± 0.27

0.42 ± 0.28

0.27 ± 0.3

0.002*

0.65

0.001*

0.02*

CPTγ before treatment (µm, mean ± SD)

199.8 ± 30.4

166.8 ± 27.9

156.2 ± 20.3

<0.001*

<0.001*

<0.001*

0.16

CFT before treatment (µm, mean ± SD)

199.8 ± 30.4

166.8 ± 27.9

156.2 ± 20.3

<0.001*

<0.001*

<0.001*

0.16

Macular volume before treatment (mm3*, mean ± SD)

8.08 ± 0.69

7.83 ± 0.52

7.4 ± 0.56

<0.001*

0.12

<0.001*

0.006*

Visual acuity after treatment (logMAR, mean ± SD)

0.40 ± 0.27

0.36 ± 0.29

0.24 ± 0.32

<0.001*

0.43

<0.001*

0.048*

CPTγ after treatment (µm, mean ± SD)

200.4 ± 36.4

168.9 ± 33.7

163.4 ± 26.1

<0.001*

<0.001*

<0.001*

0.70

CFTδ after treatment (µm, mean ± SD)

229.1 ± 28.2

197.5 ± 20.7

194.1 ± 22.8

<0.001*

<0.001*

<0.001*

0.29

Macular volume after treatment (mm3, mean ± SD)

7.83 ± 0.56

7.59 ± 0.51

7.27 ± 0.48

<0.001*

0.09

<0.001*

0.006*

  1. α Kruskall-Wallis test.
  2. β Mann-Whitney’s U test.
  3. γ Center point thickness.
  4. δ Center field thickness.
  5. *Statistical difference.