Table 3 Descriptive Statistics of the ERSQ total mean score for cluster 1 and cluster 2 and previous, large samples using the ERSQ for assessing emotion regulation skills; low values indicate reduced skills.

	Cluster 1	Cluster 2	Lukas et al.⁴⁸ HC	Grant et al.⁴⁹ HC	Berking & Znoj⁵⁰ HC	Lukas et al.⁴⁸ AD	Lukas et al.⁴⁸ MDD-SE	Lukas et al.⁴⁸ MDD-RE
Mean	2.32	1.65	2.71	2.53	2.71	2.17	1.98	1.64
SD	0.71	0.63	0.52	0.68	0.52	0.72	0.79	0.71
N	181	204	214	263	576	477	444	421
Cluster 1	—	—	d = 0.64 [0.44, 0.84]	d = 0.31 [0.12, 0.5]	d = 0.68 [0.51, 0.85]	d = −0.20 [−0.38, −0.03]	d = −0.44 [−0.61, −0.26]	d = −0.95 [−1.13, −0.77]
Cluster 2	—	—	d = 1.84 [1.61–2.07]	d = 1.34 [1.14–1.54]	d = 1.87 [1.69–2.06]	d = 0.75 [0.58–0.92]	d = 0.45 [0.28–0.62]	d = −0.01 [−0.18–0.16]

Based on the reported mean and SD effect sizes Cohen’s d [CI95] was calculated to assess differences between both clusters with healthy and clinical comparison samples. For comparison with previous research, we report here the mean total score instead of the sum. HC = healthy controls, AD = Adjustment Disorder; MDD‐SE = Major depressive disorder, single episode; MDD‐RE = Major depressive disorder, recurrent episode; M = mean; SD = standard deviation.

Quick links

Search