Figure 2
From: Individual differences in working memory capacity and cue-guided behavior in humans
Cat’s eye plot of instrumental and Pavlovian learning. Panel (a) shows the number of responses performed during the instrumental conditioning, where a significant difference between reward-associated responses (R+1, R+2) and unrewarded response (R−) was found. Panel (b) shows the liking scores of the stimuli before and after undergoing Pavlovian conditioning, where an was observed increase for the reward-associated stimuli (CS+1, CS+2) and a reduction for the unrewarded stimulus (CS−). Overall, these results confirm that participants correctly learned instrumental and Pavlovian contingencies.
