Table 2 Comparison of photocatalytic performance of Au/TiO2 with other UV-activated photocatalysts under UV irradiation.
From: Electrospinning Fabricating Au/TiO2 Network-like Nanofibers as Visible Light Activated Photocatalyst
Catalyst | Degradation time (min) | photocatalyst dosage (mg) | Power (W) | Dye concentration (mg/L) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Au/TiO2 | 30 | 20 | 100 | 10 | This work |
Ag2O/TiO2 | 60 | 9 | 300 | 10 | Appl. Surf. Sci. 396 (2017) 530–538 |
SnO2/TiO2 | 40 | 25 | 175 | 10 | AIP. Conference Proceedings 030029 (2018) 1–5 |
CeO2/TiO2 | 60 | 100 | 250 | 10 | J. Mater. Sci-Mater. El. 27 (2016) 825–833 |
N/Fe/TiO2 | 80 | 100 | 250 | 10 | J. Nanomater. 2016 (2016) 1–11 |
P/TiO2 | 50 | 50 | 100 | 10 | J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 516 (2018) 215–223 |
AlON/TiO2 | 120 | 69 | 300 | 10 | Ceram. Int. 45 (2019) 6767–6773 |
Ni/TiO2 | 120 | 20 | 300 | 10 | Ceram. Int. 40 (2014) 3887–3893 |
