Table 2 Comparison of transductive and inductive learning of the VLM and Alignment algorithms.

From: Mass spectra alignment using virtual lock-masses

Condition

AdaBoost

Decision Tree

SCM

L1-SVM

Clomiphene Detection

Transductive

98.8% (2.3)

99.4% (1.0)

99.4% (1.0)

92.8% (138.6)

Inductive

99.4% (1.0)

99.4% (1.0)

96.4% (1.0)

93.4% (90.0)

Acetaminophen Detection

Transductive

99.8% (1.0)

100.0% (1.0)

99.4% (1.0)

99.6% (63.4)

Inductive

100.0% (1.0)

99.2% (1.0)

99.6% (1.0)

98.6% (30.0)

Malaria Detection

Transductive

93.8% (65.3)

86.1% (4.8)

85.4% (2.3)

95.2% (131.4)

Inductive

92.9% (54.3)

87.8% (4.7)

84.2% (2.2)

95.1% (151.0)

Cancer Detection

Transductive

67.4% (30.0)

62.6% (2.3)

59.6% (2.2)

74.6% (135.2)

Inductive

69.2% (63.9)

61.2% (6.7)

57.4% (1.6)

68.2% (145.4)

  1. The algorithms tested were AdaBoost, the Decision Tree algorithm, the Set Covering Machine (SCM) and a L1-norm Support Vector Machine (L1-SVM).