Table 3 Competing Generalized Linear Mixed Models explaining Eurasian lynx productivity (litter size) in central-south Scandinavia in relation to variation in environmental and human factors within female lynx home ranges.

From: Eurasian lynx fitness shows little variation across Scandinavian human-dominated landscapes

COMPETING MODELS:

AICc

ΔAICc

w i

Null model

253.0

 

0.46

Roe deer harvest

253.5

0.5

0.35

Roe deer harvest + Lynx family groups

255.5

2.5

0.13

Roe deer harvest + Lynx family groups + Sheep density

257.8

4.8

0.04

Roe deer harvest + Lynx family groups + Sheep density + Coniferous forest

260.3

7.3

0.01

Roe deer harvest + Lynx family groups + Sheep density + Coniferous forest + Agricultural land

262.8

9.8

0.004

Roe deer harvest + Lynx family groups + Sheep density + Coniferous forest + Agricultural land + Roughness

265.4

12.4

0.001

  1. Models are ranked based on AICc, difference in AICc relative to the highest-ranked model (ΔAICc) and AIC-weights (wi).