Table 4 Competing Generalized Linear Mixed Models explaining juvenile lynx survival in central-south Scandinavia in relation to variation in environmental and human factors within home ranges.
From: Eurasian lynx fitness shows little variation across Scandinavian human-dominated landscapes
COMPETING MODELS: | AICc | ΔAICc | w i |
|---|---|---|---|
Null model | 219.2 | 0.34 | |
Roughness | 219.6 | 0.4 | 0.27 |
Roughness + Agricultural land | 220.4 | 1.2 | 0.18 |
Roughness + Agricultural land + Roe deer harvest | 221.1 | 1.9 | 0.13 |
Roughness + Agricultural land + Roe deer harvest + Sheep density | 222.9 | 3.7 | 0.05 |
Roughness + Agricultural land + Roe deer harvest + Sheep density + Road density | 224.9 | 5.7 | 0.012 |
Roughness + Agricultural land + Roe deer harvest + Sheep density + Road density + Urban areas | 227.4 | 8.2 | 0.005 |
Roughness + Agricultural land + Roe deer harvest + Sheep density + Road density + Urban areas + Human density | 230.0 | 10.8 | 0.001 |
