Table 4 Determination of diagnostic capabilities.

From: Detection of ANO1 mRNA in PBMCs is a promising method for GISTs diagnosis

 

AUC

95% CI

Sensitivity

Specificity

Positive predictive value

Negative predictive value

ANO1

0.80

0.73–0.88

64.2%

88.1%

91.2%

56.0%

CEA

0.67

0.71–0.87

69.5%

30.6%

71.6%

48.6%

CA199

0.73

0.65–0.82

77.8%

40.5%

65.8%

42.3%

CA724

0.79

0.58–0.77

81.5%

54.8%

77.6%

60.5%

ANO1 + CEA

0.83

0.76–0.90

77.8%

76.2%

86.3%

64.0%

ANO1 + CA199

0.87

0.82–0.94

81.5%

76.2%

86.8%

68.1%

ANO1 + CA724

0.90

0.85–0.95

83.9%

80.8%

89.4%

72.3%

CEA + CA199 + CA724

0.84

0.77–0.91

82.7%

59.5%

79.8%

64.1%

ANO1 + CEA + CA199 + CA724

0.92

0.87–0.96

87%

81%

89.8%

77.2%

  1. Summarized the AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of ANO1 mRNA, CEA, CA199 and CA724 for the diagnosis of GISTs.