Table 1 δ13C and δ15N means (standard deviations) per species in the two estuaries and PERMANOVA pairwise results (t) of the comparison of each species between the two estuaries (* and ** indicate significant differences of species in their isotopic signal, where *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01). Trophic position: producer (P), primary consumer (C1), and secondary consumer (C2).

From: Human pressures on two estuaries of the Iberian Peninsula are reflected in food web structure

Species

Organisms Type

Guadalquivir

Guadiana

t

Guadalquivir

Guadiana

t

δ13C

δ13C

δ15N

δ15N

Engraulis encrasicolus large

C2

−26.33 (0.57)

−25.14 (0.84)

2.61*

19.5 (2.23)

16.64 (1.05)

2.6*

Engraulis encrasicolus medium

C2

−25.85 (0.4)

−25.78 (0.27)

2.75*

17.12 (0.4)

16.49 (0.04)

0.68

Engraulis encrasicolus small

C2

−24.54 (0.39)

−25.29 (0.23)

5.92**

16.07 (0.1)

16.92 (0.56)

8.52**

Pomatoschistus sp.

C2

−23.53 (0.92)

−24.82 (0.03)

3.13*

18.39 (0.48)

17.28 (0.36)

4.15**

Palaemon sp .

C2/C1

−25.81 (1.45)

−24.29 (0.07)

2.34*

21.34 (2.62)

16.1 (0.1)

4.46**

Synidotea laticauda

C2/C1

−23.05 (1.72)

  

14.82 (1.4)

  

Neomysis integer

C2/C1

−27.46 (0.19)

−25.62 (0.06)

20.62**

20.74 (0.2)

16.55 (0.12)

40.34**

Mesopodopsis slabberi

C1

−27.99 (0.22)

−25.69 (0.03)

22.84**

15.42 (0.26)

15.34 (0.37)

0.41

Copepods

C1

−29.32 (0.44)

−26.63 (0.07)

13.39**

13.85 (0.16)

16.07 (0.37)

12.26**

Corbicula fluminea

C1

 

−26.93 (0.76)

  

14.28 (0.39)

 

Oligohaline vegetal matter

P

−24.89 (0.60)

−26.72 (0.02)

8.98**

10.25 (2.53)

12.22 (0.37)

1.92

SOM

P

−25.78 (0.05)

−27.2 (0.06)

28.96**

6.75 (0.52)

5.83 (0.06)

3.32