Table 1 Results of the linear regressions of each kinematics parameter against U for each gait and the z-test comparisons of the slope and intercept coefficients.

From: Terrestrial locomotion of the Svalbard rock ptarmigan: comparing field and laboratory treadmill studies

Gait

Parameter

model

Slope

Intercept

Field

Laboratory treadmill

z

p-value

z

p-value

Walk

l stride

0.142 + 0.204 U

(t = 9.287, r2 = 0.65,

n = 48, p < 0.001)

0.102 + 0.246 U

(t = 5.319, r2 = 0.96,

n = 3, p < 0.001)

−0.837

0.401

1.362

0.174

ƒ stride

1.022 + 2.051 U

(t = 10.08, r2 = 0.69,

n = 48, p < 0.001)

1.043 + 2.130

(t = 36.28, r2 = 0.99,

n = 3, p < 0.001)

−0.372

0.711

−0.149

0.881

t stance

−0.679–0.720 log10 U

(t = −10.97, r2 = 0.83,

n = 26, p < 0.001)

−0.646–0.623 log10 U

(t = −7.368, r2 = 0.98,

n = 3, p = 0.086)

−1.178

0.238

−1.217

0.222

t swing

−0.879–0.184 log10 U

(t = −2.30, r2 = 0.18,

n = 26, p = 0.031)

−0.838–0.012 log10 U

(t = −0.20, r2 = 0.03,

n = 3, p = 0.88)

−1.688

0.091

−1.172

0.242

DF

0.814–0.230 U

(t = −6.21, r2 = 0.62,

n = 25, p < 0.001)

0.858–0.281 U

(t = −6.72, r2 = 0.98,

n = 3, p = 0.094)

0.930

0.352

−1.390

0.165

Grounded running

l stride

0.260 + 0.088 U

(t = 3.74, r2 = 0.21,

n = 56, p < 0.001)

0.194 + 0.158 U

(t = 7.934, r2 = 0.95,

n = 5, p < 0.01)

−2.275

 < 0.05

ƒ stride

0.979 + 1.925 U

(t = 9.55, r2 = 0.63,

n = 56, p < 0.001)

1.621 + 1.258 U

(t = 5.728, r2 = 0.92,

n = 5, p < 0.05)

2.238

 < 0.05

t stance

−0.707–1.021log10 U

(t = −9.91, r2 = 0.78,

n = 30, p < 0.001)

−0.656–0.955 log10 U

(t = −44.49, r2 = 0.99,

n = 5, p < 0.001)

−0.845

0.593

t swing

−0.833–0.392 log10 U

(t = −3.53, r2 = 0.31,

n = 30, p < 0.01)

−0.796 + 0.00 log10 U

(t = 0, r2 = 0.51,

n = 5, p = 0.167)

−3.529

<0.001

DF

0.689–0.122 U

(t = −4.47, r2 = 0.42,

n = 30, p < 0.001)

0.734–0.164 U

(t = −18.18, r2 = 0.99,

n = 5, p < 0.001)

1.479

0.139

Aerial Running

l stride

0.144 + 0.162 U

(t = 11.54, r2 = 0.69,

n = 61, p < 0.001)

0.247 + 0.131 U

(t = 2.484, r2 = 0.75,

n = 4, p = 0.131)

0.552

0.582

ƒ stride

2.947 + 0.665 U

(t = 5.27, r2 = 0.32,

n = 61, p < 0.001)

1.788 + 1.078 U

(t = 3.12, r2 = 0.82,

n = 4, p = 0.089)

−1.122

0.263

t stance

−0.83–0.469 log10 U

(t = −3.41, r2 = 0.28,

n = 32, p < 0.01)

−0.698–0.723 log10 U

(t = −3.32, r2 = 0.85,

n = 4, p = 0.08)

0.983

0.327

t swing

−0.855–0.136 log10 U

(t = −1.20, r2 = 0.04,

n = 32, p = 0.24)

−0.722–0.311 log10 U

(t = −1.71, r2 = 0.59,

n = 4, p = 0.23)

−0.636

0.522

DF

0.54–0.042 U

(t = −2.084, r2 = 0.13,

n = 32, p = 0.045)

0.621–0.095 U

(t = −1.992, r2 = 0.67,

n = 4, p = 0.185)

1.02

0.308

  1. The lines of best fit are also given. Only the intercepts for the walking gaits were compared, because comparison for grounded running and aerial running would require extrapolating the lines of best fit too far beyond the data range rendering their estimates unreliable. Statistical significance is set as p < 0.05.