Table 1 Mean values of photosynthetic, anatomical, and morphological traits of the 4–22 fully-expanded mature leaves in the 4-year-old trees.

From: Overexpressing the HD-Zip class II transcription factor EcHB1 from Eucalyptus camaldulensis increased the leaf photosynthesis and drought tolerance of Eucalyptus

Trait

GUT5(control)

EcHB1-2 + EcHB1-10 (overexpression)

Leaf photosynthetic traits

Amax (μmol m−2 s−1)

9.4 (0.3)

14.8 (0.6)***

gs (mol m−2 s−1)

0.0796 (0.0063)

0.0966 (0.0034)n.s.

gm (mol m−2 s−1)

0.0325 (0.0022)

0.0598 (0.0075)***

A1500/E1500 (μmol CO2 mmol H2O−1)

3.01 (0.13)

3.96 (0.12)***

Vcmax (μmol m−2 s−1)

36.6 (0.7)

45.5 (1.5)***

J (μmol electrons m−2 s−1)

71.1 (2.2)

89.5 (3)***

Leaf anatomical traits related to mesophyll CO 2 diffusion

Sc (m2 m−2)

9.1 (0.7)

14.7 (0.3)***

Mesophyll cell wall thickness (μm)

0.183 (0.014)

0.208 (0.005)n.s.

Number of cells and size

Mesophyll cell number (mm−1 section)

336 (14)

457 (11)***

Mesophyll palisade cell width (μm)

9.7 (0.4)

7.8 (0.2)***

Mesophyll palisade cell length (μm)

64.3 (1.8)

63.6 (1.7)n.s.

Mesophyll spongy cell width (μm)

8.9 (0.3)

9.4 (0.3)n.s.

Mesophyll spongy cell length (μm)

19.9 (1.4)

26.5 (0.5)***

Epidermal cell width (μm)

22.6 (1.6)

18.2 (0.5)*

Epidermal cell thickness (μm)

18.5 (0.5)

15.9 (0.2)***

Number of chloroplasts and size

Chloroplasts (103 mm−1 section)

1.46 (0.08)

2.24 (0.06)***

Chloroplast width (μm)

5.23 (0.15)

4.02 (0.11)***

Chloroplast thickness (μm)

1.26 (0.06)

1.09 (0.02)**

Other leaf traits

Leaf area (cm2)

31.5 (2.3)

14.9 (0.3)***

Leaf mass per area (g m−2)

73.6 (3.5)

90.5 (3.8)**

Mesophyll thickness (μm)

256 (7)

247 (4)n.s.

Chlorophyll content (SPAD)

34.4 (0.8)

41.0 (0.6)***

Stomatal morphological traits

Stomatal length (μm)

11.9 (0.3)

12.3 (0.3)n.s.

Stomatal width (μm)

6.26 (0.19)

6.17 (0.15)n.s.

Stomatal density (mm−2)

521 (44)

495 (39)n.s.

  1. Means with standard errors in parenthesis are shown. Data obtained using the isotope method are presented for mesophyll conductance (gm). Anatomical data were obtained using light or electron micrographs (n = 25–120). Significant levels were tested by Welch’s t-test with differences shown as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001. n.s. means no significant difference (P > 0.09).