Table 1 Comparison of the hydrodynamic properties of CIB2, CaM and Rec.
HydroPro Ø (nm) | Gyration radius (nm) | DLS Ø [n] (nm)a | Hydrophobic SAS area (nm2) | Hydrophilic SAS area (nm2) | Total SAS area (nm2) | MW (kDa) | MWSEC (kDa) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIB2 (13–184)b | 4.736 | 1.88 | 5.4 ± 0.2 [15] | 59.94 | 55.34 | 115.38 | 21.3 | 37.8 (A2 band) |
Rec (1-201)b | 5.112 | 1.94 | 5.0a ± 0.1 [18] | 62.54 | 64.68 | 127.23 | 23.3 | 33.5 |
CaM (1–149)b | 5.076 | 2.22 | 5.8 ± 0.1 [30] | 50.28 | 54.97 | 105.26 | 16.8 | 20.5 |