Table 2 Parameters of the log–logistic equationsa used to calculate the concentration (µM) of the ALS-inhibiting herbicides needed to inhibit the ALS activity by 50% (I50) in two biotypes (S, susceptible; R, resistant) of E. heterophylla.
From: Target site as the main mechanism of resistance to imazamox in a Euphorbia heterophylla biotype
Herbicideb | Biotype | c | d | b | R2aj | P value | I50 | RF |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bensulfuron (SU) | S† | — | 100.0 ± 5.1 | 2.05 ± 0.11 | 0.99 | <0.0001 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 12.5 |
R | 7.1 ± 0.3 | 100.8 ± 7.3 | 1.36 ± 0.08 | 0.99 | <0.0001 | 19.1 ± 0.7 | ||
Bispyribac (PTB) | S | 10.4 ± 0.5 | 101.0 ± 3.1 | 0.99 ± 0.05 | 0.98 | <0.0001 | 137.7 ± 6.7 | 2.0 |
R | 21.9 ± 1.1 | 100.1 ± 4.9 | 2.31 ± 0.10 | 0.99 | <0.0001 | 269.3 ± 6.4 | ||
Florasulam (TP) | S† | — | 101.5 ± 3.9 | 1.18 ± 0.04 | 0.99 | <0.0001 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 524.7 |
R | 16.9 ± 0.7 | 100.8 ± 1.2 | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.98 | <0.0001 | 692.6 ± 11.1 | ||
Flucarbazone (SCT) | S | 3.9 ± 0.2 | 100.2 ± 6.8 | 0.80 ± 0.02 | 0.99 | <0.0001 | 20.7 ± 1.0 | 17.3 |
R | 12.5 ± 0.6 | 100.2 ± 2.6 | 1.28 ± 0.04 | 0.99 | <0.0001 | 358.3 ± 9.5 | ||
Imazamox (IMI) | S | 1.8 ± 0.1 | 100.0 ± 1.9 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 0.98 | <0.0001 | 33.7 ± 1.0 | 16.0 |
R | 19.6 ± 1.0 | 100.2 ± 3.1 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 0.99 | <0.0001 | 538.4 ± 8.1 |