Table 1 Mean WMH volume of the reference segmentations and the segmentations of the methods for each scanner (n = 42; n = 7 per scanner).

From: Performance of five automated white matter hyperintensity segmentation methods in a multicenter dataset

WMH volume

GE Signa

HDxt 1.5T

GE Signa

HDxt 3T

GE Discovery

MR750 3T

Philips

Ingenuity 3T

Philips

Ingenia 3T

Philips

Achieva 3T

Overall

mean ± SD

Reference

22 ± 31

16 ± 18

9 ± 10

14 ± 17

41 ± 71

24 ± 26

21 ± 10

Cascade

26 ± 20

19 ± 11

13 ± 5

19 ± 10

12 ± 4

11 ± 5

17 ± 5

kNN-TTP

16 ± 19

14 ± 13

9 ± 10

14 ± 17

32 ± 49

20 ± 22

18 ± 7

Lesion-TOADS

19 ± 20

16 ± 12

11 ± 9

36 ± 24

30 ± 45

31 ± 16

24 ± 9

LST-LGA

20 ± 19

19 ± 23

12 ± 15

15 ± 20

22 ± 28

14 ± 17

17 ± 4

LST-LPA

18 ± 22

15 ± 18

11 ± 13

14 ± 18

33 ± 51

18 ± 22

18 ± 7

  1. Note: Values represent mean WMH volumes ± SD in mL. Reference: reference segmentations.
Back to article page