Table 3 Meta-analytic results.

From: The relationship between mindfulness and objective measures of body awareness: A meta-analysis

Model

k

n

ES [95% CI]

I2 [95% CI]

kimp

ESadj [95% CI]

FSN

Overall

17

879

0.21 [0.08, 0.34]

0.0 [0.0, 63.0]

0

NA

53

Trait

3

160

0.24 [−0.06, 0.55]

0.0 [0.0, 97.0]

0

NA

1

LTMs

8

244

0.20 [−0.04, 0.44]

13.5 [0.0, 86.9]

0

NA

3

RCTs

7

505

0.20 [0.02, 0.38]

0.0 [0.0, 68.9]

0

NA

5

Proximal

13

759

0.17 [0.03, 0.31]

0.0 [0.0, 55.5]

0

NA

10

Distal

6

170

0.31 [0.01, 0.61]

18.5 [0.0, 91.4]

1

0.24 [−0.08, 0.56]

7

Heartbeat

9

622

0.13 [−0.03, 0.29]

0.0 [0.0, 58.1]

2

0.16 [0.01, 0.32]

0

  1. Note: k = independent samples included; n = total sample size; ES = effect size in Hedges’ g units; CI = confidence interval; I2 = between-study heterogeneity; kimp = number of studies imputed to account for asymmetric funnel plot; ESadj = adjusted effect size based on trim-and-fill analysis; FSN = fail-safe N; NA = not applicable due to insufficient studies or absence of imputed studies; Proximal = omnibus effect size computed using proximal measures of body awareness only; Distal = omnibus effect size computed using distal measures of body awareness only.
Back to article page